Total ghg emissions excluding lufc in Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan: Total ghg emissions excluding lufc was 323.81 million in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
323.81 million
Change on year
up 0.4%
World rank
21st
of 198 countries
All-time high
366.77 million
in 2018
All-time low
747,304
in 1851
Years of data
175
1850–2024
Total ghg emissions excluding lufc in Kazakhstan, 1850–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
In 2024, total ghg emissions excluding lufc in Kazakhstan stood at 323.81 million.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 0.4% on the previous year and down 4.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, total ghg emissions excluding lufc in Kazakhstan peaked at 366.77 million in 2018 and was at its lowest, 747,304, in 1851.
That places Kazakhstan 21st out of 198 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Total ghg emissions excluding lufc in Kazakhstan, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1850 | 750,191 | — |
| 1851 | 747,304 | -0.4% |
| 1852 | 753,708 | +0.9% |
| 1853 | 760,092 | +0.8% |
| 1854 | 766,448 | +0.8% |
| 1855 | 800,716 | +4.5% |
| 1856 | 779,047 | -2.7% |
| 1857 | 785,339 | +0.8% |
| 1858 | 831,138 | +5.8% |
| 1859 | 840,139 | +1.1% |
| 1860 | 859,900 | +2.4% |
| 1861 | 882,057 | +2.6% |
| 1862 | 882,594 | +0.1% |
| 1863 | 892,858 | +1.2% |
| 1864 | 908,135 | +1.7% |
| 1865 | 912,253 | +0.5% |
| 1866 | 1.07 million | +17.4% |
| 1867 | 1.11 million | +3.7% |
| 1868 | 1.08 million | -3.2% |
| 1869 | 1.16 million | +7.7% |
| 1870 | 1.19 million | +2.8% |
| 1871 | 1.31 million | +10.1% |
| 1872 | 1.33 million | +1.8% |
| 1873 | 1.32 million | -1.1% |
| 1874 | 1.42 million | +7.6% |
| 1875 | 1.51 million | +6.2% |
| 1876 | 1.66 million | +10.0% |
| 1877 | 1.68 million | +1.6% |
| 1878 | 1.92 million | +14.0% |
| 1879 | 1.96 million | +1.9% |
| 1880 | 2.14 million | +9.3% |
| 1881 | 2.20 million | +3.1% |
| 1882 | 2.28 million | +3.4% |
| 1883 | 2.46 million | +8.2% |
| 1884 | 2.49 million | +0.9% |
| 1885 | 2.62 million | +5.4% |
| 1886 | 2.67 million | +1.9% |
| 1887 | 2.77 million | +3.6% |
| 1888 | 2.85 million | +3.0% |
| 1889 | 3.01 million | +5.5% |
| 1890 | 3.27 million | +8.7% |
| 1891 | 3.50 million | +7.1% |
| 1892 | 3.67 million | +4.7% |
| 1893 | 4.13 million | +12.6% |
| 1894 | 4.22 million | +2.3% |
| 1895 | 4.68 million | +10.8% |
| 1896 | 4.77 million | +2.0% |
| 1897 | 5.36 million | +12.4% |
| 1898 | 5.89 million | +9.9% |
| 1899 | 6.69 million | +13.5% |
| 1900 | 7.44 million | +11.2% |
| 1901 | 7.60 million | +2.1% |
| 1902 | 7.41 million | -2.5% |
| 1903 | 7.32 million | -1.2% |
| 1904 | 8.03 million | +9.8% |
| 1905 | 7.38 million | -8.2% |
| 1906 | 8.25 million | +11.8% |
| 1907 | 9.12 million | +10.5% |
| 1908 | 9.19 million | +0.8% |
| 1909 | 9.64 million | +4.9% |
| 1910 | 9.48 million | -1.6% |
| 1911 | 9.89 million | +4.3% |
| 1912 | 11.15 million | +12.7% |
| 1913 | 12.13 million | +8.8% |
| 1914 | 11.14 million | -8.1% |
| 1915 | 10.38 million | -6.8% |
| 1916 | 11.06 million | +6.5% |
| 1917 | 10.40 million | -6.0% |
| 1918 | 5.12 million | -50.8% |
| 1919 | 4.59 million | -10.4% |
| 1920 | 4.37 million | -4.7% |
| 1921 | 4.64 million | +6.2% |
| 1922 | 5.32 million | +14.7% |
| 1923 | 5.73 million | +7.6% |
| 1924 | 6.57 million | +14.6% |
| 1925 | 6.51 million | -0.9% |
| 1926 | 8.77 million | +34.7% |
| 1927 | 10.53 million | +20.1% |
| 1928 | 11.58 million | +10.0% |
| 1929 | 12.31 million | +6.3% |
| 1930 | 15.90 million | +29.2% |
| 1931 | 18.84 million | +18.5% |
| 1932 | 21.32 million | +13.1% |
| 1933 | 23.86 million | +11.9% |
| 1934 | 28.69 million | +20.2% |
| 1935 | 32.48 million | +13.2% |
| 1936 | 37.19 million | +14.5% |
| 1937 | 38.14 million | +2.5% |
| 1938 | 40.32 million | +5.7% |
| 1939 | 40.98 million | +1.6% |
| 1940 | 49.14 million | +19.9% |
| 1941 | 43.23 million | -12.0% |
| 1942 | 25.92 million | -40.0% |
| 1943 | 29.36 million | +13.3% |
| 1944 | 35.24 million | +20.0% |
| 1945 | 37.76 million | +7.1% |
| 1946 | 41.77 million | +10.6% |
| 1947 | 49.37 million | +18.2% |
| 1948 | 51.90 million | +5.1% |
| 1949 | 58.15 million | +12.1% |
| 1950 | 63.96 million | +10.0% |
| 1951 | 68.94 million | +7.8% |
| 1952 | 73.54 million | +6.7% |
| 1953 | 77.67 million | +5.6% |
| 1954 | 84.74 million | +9.1% |
| 1955 | 95.83 million | +13.1% |
| 1956 | 104.72 million | +9.3% |
| 1957 | 114.14 million | +9.0% |
| 1958 | 121.17 million | +6.2% |
| 1959 | 126.81 million | +4.7% |
| 1960 | 131.16 million | +3.4% |
| 1961 | 134.07 million | +2.2% |
| 1962 | 139.14 million | +3.8% |
| 1963 | 147.82 million | +6.2% |
| 1964 | 155.68 million | +5.3% |
| 1965 | 163.63 million | +5.1% |
| 1966 | 171.25 million | +4.7% |
| 1967 | 176.93 million | +3.3% |
| 1968 | 179.68 million | +1.6% |
| 1969 | 185.07 million | +3.0% |
| 1970 | 198.90 million | +7.5% |
| 1971 | 207.77 million | +4.5% |
| 1972 | 216.84 million | +4.4% |
| 1973 | 225.05 million | +3.8% |
| 1974 | 231.86 million | +3.0% |
| 1975 | 242.36 million | +4.5% |
| 1976 | 251.16 million | +3.6% |
| 1977 | 257.80 million | +2.6% |
| 1978 | 264.82 million | +2.7% |
| 1979 | 266.33 million | +0.6% |
| 1980 | 273.52 million | +2.7% |
| 1981 | 267.16 million | -2.3% |
| 1982 | 271.03 million | +1.4% |
| 1983 | 273.03 million | +0.7% |
| 1984 | 278.23 million | +1.9% |
| 1985 | 291.79 million | +4.9% |
| 1986 | 297.34 million | +1.9% |
| 1987 | 296.20 million | -0.4% |
| 1988 | 313.57 million | +5.9% |
| 1989 | 305.62 million | -2.5% |
| 1990 | 315.21 million | +3.1% |
| 1991 | 305.63 million | -3.0% |
| 1992 | 279.80 million | -8.5% |
| 1993 | 248.86 million | -11.1% |
| 1994 | 206.29 million | -17.1% |
| 1995 | 194.38 million | -5.8% |
| 1996 | 178.87 million | -8.0% |
| 1997 | 170.48 million | -4.7% |
| 1998 | 168.24 million | -1.3% |
| 1999 | 138.90 million | -17.4% |
| 2000 | 165.95 million | +19.5% |
| 2001 | 162.49 million | -2.1% |
| 2002 | 181.47 million | +11.7% |
| 2003 | 201.86 million | +11.2% |
| 2004 | 213.50 million | +5.8% |
| 2005 | 226.93 million | +6.3% |
| 2006 | 250.51 million | +10.4% |
| 2007 | 257.62 million | +2.8% |
| 2008 | 261.80 million | +1.6% |
| 2009 | 258.08 million | -1.4% |
| 2010 | 285.42 million | +10.6% |
| 2011 | 276.29 million | -3.2% |
| 2012 | 284.04 million | +2.8% |
| 2013 | 292.19 million | +2.9% |
| 2014 | 337.69 million | +15.6% |
| 2015 | 335.21 million | -0.7% |
| 2016 | 334.77 million | -0.1% |
| 2017 | 354.08 million | +5.8% |
| 2018 | 366.77 million | +3.6% |
| 2019 | 332.35 million | -9.4% |
| 2020 | 317.19 million | -4.6% |
| 2021 | 281.46 million | -11.3% |
| 2022 | 311.28 million | +10.6% |
| 2023 | 322.54 million | +3.6% |
| 2024 | 323.81 million | +0.4% |
Kazakhstan compared with similar countries
- Kazakhstan's 323.81 million is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 29.43 million, 11.0× the median. (57 countries reporting)
- Kazakhstan's 323.81 million is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 40.83 million, 7.9× the median. (50 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Total ghg emissions excluding lufc in Kazakhstan changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1918 | -50.8% | 10.40 million | 5.12 million |
| 1942 | -40.0% | 43.23 million | 25.92 million |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 781,412 | 747,304 | 840,139 | 10 |
| 1860s | 975,321 | 859,900 | 1.16 million | 10 |
| 1870s | 1.53 million | 1.19 million | 1.96 million | 10 |
| 1880s | 2.55 million | 2.14 million | 3.01 million | 10 |
| 1890s | 4.62 million | 3.27 million | 6.69 million | 10 |
| 1900s | 8.13 million | 7.32 million | 9.64 million | 10 |
| 1910s | 9.54 million | 4.59 million | 12.13 million | 10 |
| 1920s | 7.63 million | 4.37 million | 12.31 million | 10 |
| 1930s | 29.77 million | 15.90 million | 40.98 million | 10 |
| 1940s | 42.18 million | 25.92 million | 58.15 million | 10 |
| 1950s | 93.15 million | 63.96 million | 126.81 million | 10 |
| 1960s | 158.44 million | 131.16 million | 185.07 million | 10 |
| 1970s | 236.29 million | 198.90 million | 266.33 million | 10 |
| 1980s | 286.75 million | 267.16 million | 313.57 million | 10 |
| 1990s | 220.67 million | 138.90 million | 315.21 million | 10 |
| 2000s | 218.02 million | 162.49 million | 261.80 million | 10 |
| 2010s | 319.88 million | 276.29 million | 366.77 million | 10 |
| 2020s | 311.26 million | 281.46 million | 323.81 million | 5 |
Countries ranked near Kazakhstan
More climate change data for Kazakhstan
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 52.07 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 21,403 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 5,230 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 16,173 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 19.73 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 577.6 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 2,395 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 1,596 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 798.63 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 6.02 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is total ghg emissions excluding lufc in Kazakhstan?
- Total ghg emissions excluding lufc in Kazakhstan was 323.81 million in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest total ghg emissions excluding lufc recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The highest recorded value was 366.77 million in 2018.
- What is the lowest total ghg emissions excluding lufc recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The lowest recorded value was 747,304 in 1851.
- How does Kazakhstan rank for total ghg emissions excluding lufc?
- Kazakhstan ranks 21st out of 198 countries with data for 2024.
- Is total ghg emissions excluding lufc rising or falling in Kazakhstan?
- Over the last ten years it is down 4.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Kazakhstan data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Total ghg emissions excluding lufc. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 175 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).