Total ghg emissions in Sri Lanka
Sri Lanka: Total ghg emissions was 42.70 million in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Total ghg emissions in Sri Lanka, 1850–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
In 2024, total ghg emissions in Sri Lanka stood at 42.70 million.
That represents a change of up 4.1% on the previous year and up 6.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, total ghg emissions in Sri Lanka peaked at 88.91 million in 1962 and was at its lowest, 4.41 million, in 1879.
Sri Lanka ranks 103rd of 199 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Total ghg emissions in Sri Lanka, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1850 | 15.20 million | — |
| 1851 | 14.54 million | -4.4% |
| 1852 | 13.96 million | -4.0% |
| 1853 | 13.76 million | -1.4% |
| 1854 | 14.18 million | +3.1% |
| 1855 | 14.05 million | -1.0% |
| 1856 | 13.82 million | -1.6% |
| 1857 | 13.97 million | +1.1% |
| 1858 | 14.00 million | +0.3% |
| 1859 | 14.54 million | +3.8% |
| 1860 | 12.86 million | -11.6% |
| 1861 | 10.80 million | -16.0% |
| 1862 | 10.23 million | -5.2% |
| 1863 | 10.45 million | +2.2% |
| 1864 | 9.83 million | -6.0% |
| 1865 | 9.55 million | -2.8% |
| 1866 | 9.42 million | -1.4% |
| 1867 | 9.54 million | +1.3% |
| 1868 | 9.61 million | +0.7% |
| 1869 | 8.92 million | -7.1% |
| 1870 | 6.83 million | -23.5% |
| 1871 | 5.92 million | -13.3% |
| 1872 | 5.46 million | -7.8% |
| 1873 | 5.18 million | -5.1% |
| 1874 | 5.17 million | -0.1% |
| 1875 | 4.89 million | -5.4% |
| 1876 | 4.74 million | -3.2% |
| 1877 | 4.61 million | -2.7% |
| 1878 | 4.50 million | -2.5% |
| 1879 | 4.41 million | -2.0% |
| 1880 | 5.39 million | +22.4% |
| 1881 | 5.76 million | +6.9% |
| 1882 | 6.34 million | +10.1% |
| 1883 | 6.34 million | -0.1% |
| 1884 | 6.53 million | +3.1% |
| 1885 | 6.55 million | +0.2% |
| 1886 | 6.80 million | +3.9% |
| 1887 | 6.68 million | -1.9% |
| 1888 | 6.70 million | +0.4% |
| 1889 | 7.25 million | +8.1% |
| 1890 | 8.57 million | +18.3% |
| 1891 | 11.02 million | +28.6% |
| 1892 | 11.38 million | +3.3% |
| 1893 | 10.90 million | -4.2% |
| 1894 | 11.78 million | +8.0% |
| 1895 | 11.34 million | -3.7% |
| 1896 | 12.02 million | +5.9% |
| 1897 | 13.69 million | +13.9% |
| 1898 | 12.75 million | -6.8% |
| 1899 | 13.82 million | +8.3% |
| 1900 | 12.79 million | -7.4% |
| 1901 | 11.14 million | -12.9% |
| 1902 | 10.37 million | -7.0% |
| 1903 | 11.03 million | +6.4% |
| 1904 | 10.46 million | -5.1% |
| 1905 | 11.35 million | +8.5% |
| 1906 | 11.89 million | +4.8% |
| 1907 | 11.09 million | -6.8% |
| 1908 | 10.44 million | -5.8% |
| 1909 | 12.16 million | +16.4% |
| 1910 | 10.33 million | -15.1% |
| 1911 | 10.66 million | +3.3% |
| 1912 | 9.85 million | -7.7% |
| 1913 | 10.00 million | +1.6% |
| 1914 | 10.92 million | +9.2% |
| 1915 | 9.95 million | -8.9% |
| 1916 | 10.30 million | +3.5% |
| 1917 | 9.98 million | -3.2% |
| 1918 | 10.02 million | +0.4% |
| 1919 | 10.79 million | +7.8% |
| 1920 | 9.92 million | -8.1% |
| 1921 | 9.63 million | -2.9% |
| 1922 | 9.41 million | -2.3% |
| 1923 | 9.56 million | +1.5% |
| 1924 | 9.25 million | -3.2% |
| 1925 | 9.32 million | +0.7% |
| 1926 | 9.27 million | -0.5% |
| 1927 | 9.40 million | +1.4% |
| 1928 | 9.88 million | +5.1% |
| 1929 | 9.78 million | -1.0% |
| 1930 | 10.05 million | +2.8% |
| 1931 | 10.21 million | +1.5% |
| 1932 | 10.60 million | +3.9% |
| 1933 | 10.63 million | +0.3% |
| 1934 | 10.74 million | +0.9% |
| 1935 | 10.88 million | +1.3% |
| 1936 | 11.58 million | +6.4% |
| 1937 | 11.32 million | -2.3% |
| 1938 | 11.96 million | +5.7% |
| 1939 | 11.74 million | -1.8% |
| 1940 | 16.14 million | +37.5% |
| 1941 | 19.04 million | +17.9% |
| 1942 | 20.40 million | +7.2% |
| 1943 | 22.72 million | +11.4% |
| 1944 | 24.42 million | +7.5% |
| 1945 | 24.23 million | -0.8% |
| 1946 | 24.63 million | +1.6% |
| 1947 | 25.84 million | +4.9% |
| 1948 | 25.21 million | -2.4% |
| 1949 | 28.01 million | +11.1% |
| 1950 | 25.27 million | -9.8% |
| 1951 | 24.58 million | -2.8% |
| 1952 | 24.14 million | -1.8% |
| 1953 | 25.15 million | +4.1% |
| 1954 | 25.19 million | +0.2% |
| 1955 | 26.55 million | +5.4% |
| 1956 | 26.63 million | +0.3% |
| 1957 | 29.50 million | +10.7% |
| 1958 | 29.60 million | +0.3% |
| 1959 | 26.87 million | -9.2% |
| 1960 | 23.90 million | -11.1% |
| 1961 | 22.37 million | -6.4% |
| 1962 | 88.91 million | +297.5% |
| 1963 | 64.50 million | -27.5% |
| 1964 | 53.98 million | -16.3% |
| 1965 | 44.32 million | -17.9% |
| 1966 | 40.04 million | -9.7% |
| 1967 | 40.90 million | +2.1% |
| 1968 | 35.56 million | -13.0% |
| 1969 | 33.81 million | -4.9% |
| 1970 | 32.17 million | -4.8% |
| 1971 | 31.29 million | -2.7% |
| 1972 | 29.87 million | -4.5% |
| 1973 | 29.43 million | -1.5% |
| 1974 | 28.09 million | -4.6% |
| 1975 | 32.69 million | +16.4% |
| 1976 | 35.26 million | +7.9% |
| 1977 | 36.98 million | +4.9% |
| 1978 | 30.08 million | -18.7% |
| 1979 | 28.08 million | -6.6% |
| 1980 | 27.05 million | -3.7% |
| 1981 | 26.83 million | -0.8% |
| 1982 | 28.38 million | +5.8% |
| 1983 | 28.12 million | -0.9% |
| 1984 | 28.27 million | +0.5% |
| 1985 | 28.98 million | +2.5% |
| 1986 | 28.44 million | -1.9% |
| 1987 | 27.57 million | -3.0% |
| 1988 | 27.23 million | -1.2% |
| 1989 | 26.26 million | -3.6% |
| 1990 | 26.97 million | +2.7% |
| 1991 | 28.44 million | +5.4% |
| 1992 | 29.62 million | +4.1% |
| 1993 | 30.92 million | +4.4% |
| 1994 | 34.55 million | +11.8% |
| 1995 | 34.03 million | -1.5% |
| 1996 | 34.71 million | +2.0% |
| 1997 | 32.20 million | -7.2% |
| 1998 | 31.87 million | -1.0% |
| 1999 | 31.44 million | -1.3% |
| 2000 | 32.48 million | +3.3% |
| 2001 | 31.49 million | -3.0% |
| 2002 | 33.51 million | +6.4% |
| 2003 | 34.68 million | +3.5% |
| 2004 | 59.04 million | +70.2% |
| 2005 | 41.65 million | -29.4% |
| 2006 | 40.07 million | -3.8% |
| 2007 | 60.72 million | +51.5% |
| 2008 | 50.36 million | -17.1% |
| 2009 | 45.55 million | -9.6% |
| 2010 | 53.20 million | +16.8% |
| 2011 | 48.12 million | -9.5% |
| 2012 | 43.42 million | -9.8% |
| 2013 | 39.50 million | -9.0% |
| 2014 | 40.21 million | +1.8% |
| 2015 | 45.28 million | +12.6% |
| 2016 | 46.70 million | +3.1% |
| 2017 | 49.41 million | +5.8% |
| 2018 | 43.63 million | -11.7% |
| 2019 | 42.62 million | -2.3% |
| 2020 | 41.68 million | -2.2% |
| 2021 | 41.39 million | -0.7% |
| 2022 | 39.83 million | -3.8% |
| 2023 | 41.02 million | +3.0% |
| 2024 | 42.70 million | +4.1% |
Sri Lanka compared with similar countries
- Sri Lanka's 42.70 million is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 42.70 million, 1.0× the median. (57 countries reporting)
- Sri Lanka's 42.70 million is below the median for South Asia, which is 50.77 million, 84% of the median. (6 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Total ghg emissions in Sri Lanka changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1962 | +297.5% | 22.37 million | 88.91 million |
| 2004 | +70.2% | 34.68 million | 59.04 million |
| 2007 | +51.5% | 40.07 million | 60.72 million |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 14.20 million | 13.76 million | 15.20 million | 10 |
| 1860s | 10.12 million | 8.92 million | 12.86 million | 10 |
| 1870s | 5.17 million | 4.41 million | 6.83 million | 10 |
| 1880s | 6.43 million | 5.39 million | 7.25 million | 10 |
| 1890s | 11.73 million | 8.57 million | 13.82 million | 10 |
| 1900s | 11.27 million | 10.37 million | 12.79 million | 10 |
| 1910s | 10.28 million | 9.85 million | 10.92 million | 10 |
| 1920s | 9.54 million | 9.25 million | 9.92 million | 10 |
| 1930s | 10.97 million | 10.05 million | 11.96 million | 10 |
| 1940s | 23.06 million | 16.14 million | 28.01 million | 10 |
| 1950s | 26.35 million | 24.14 million | 29.60 million | 10 |
| 1960s | 44.83 million | 22.37 million | 88.91 million | 10 |
| 1970s | 31.39 million | 28.08 million | 36.98 million | 10 |
| 1980s | 27.71 million | 26.26 million | 28.98 million | 10 |
| 1990s | 31.47 million | 26.97 million | 34.71 million | 10 |
| 2000s | 42.96 million | 31.49 million | 60.72 million | 10 |
| 2010s | 45.21 million | 39.50 million | 53.20 million | 10 |
| 2020s | 41.33 million | 39.83 million | 42.70 million | 5 |
Countries ranked near Sri Lanka
More climate change data for Sri Lanka
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 327.09 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 3,418 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 618.46 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 2,800 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 2.33 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 100 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 4,168 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 2,071 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 2,097 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 7.82 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is total ghg emissions in Sri Lanka?
- Total ghg emissions in Sri Lanka was 42.70 million in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest total ghg emissions recorded in Sri Lanka?
- The highest recorded value was 88.91 million in 1962.
- What is the lowest total ghg emissions recorded in Sri Lanka?
- The lowest recorded value was 4.41 million in 1879.
- How does Sri Lanka rank for total ghg emissions?
- Sri Lanka ranks 103rd out of 199 countries with data for 2024.
- Is total ghg emissions rising or falling in Sri Lanka?
- Over the last ten years it is up 6.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Sri Lanka data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Total ghg emissions. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 175 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).