Vulnerability in Latvia
Latvia: Vulnerability was 4.1 in 2025. ▲ Rising
Vulnerability in Latvia, 2013–2025
Source: International Monetary Fund.
Analysis
In 2025, vulnerability in Latvia stood at 4.1.
That represents a change of up 241.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, vulnerability in Latvia peaked at 4.3 in 2016 and was at its lowest, 1.2, in 2013.
That places Latvia 86th out of 191 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 13 years of available data.
Vulnerability in Latvia, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 1.2 | — |
| 2014 | 1.2 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 1.2 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 4.3 | +258.3% |
| 2017 | 4.3 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 4.2 | -2.3% |
| 2019 | 4.1 | -2.4% |
| 2020 | 4.2 | +2.4% |
| 2021 | 4.1 | -2.4% |
| 2022 | 4.2 | +2.4% |
| 2023 | 4.2 | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 4.1 | -2.4% |
| 2025 | 4.1 | +0.0% |
Latvia compared with similar countries
- Latvia's 4.1 is above the median for high income countries, which is 2.7, 1.5× the median. (61 countries reporting)
- Latvia's 4.1 is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 2.9, 1.4× the median. (49 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Vulnerability in Latvia changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | +258.3% | 1.2 | 4.3 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2.93 | 1.2 | 4.3 | 7 |
| 2020s | 4.15 | 4.1 | 4.2 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Latvia
More climate change data for Latvia
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 43.09 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 1,340 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 263.83 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 1,077 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 0.9956 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 38.45 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 342.8 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 336.47 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 6.33 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 1.27 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is vulnerability in Latvia?
- Vulnerability in Latvia was 4.1 in 2025, according to International Monetary Fund.
- What is the highest vulnerability recorded in Latvia?
- The highest recorded value was 4.3 in 2016.
- What is the lowest vulnerability recorded in Latvia?
- The lowest recorded value was 1.2 in 2013.
- How does Latvia rank for vulnerability?
- Latvia ranks 86th out of 191 countries with data for 2025.
- Is vulnerability rising or falling in Latvia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 241.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Latvia data come from?
- The figures come from International Monetary Fund, published as part of Vulnerability. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 13 observations, free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required).
About this data
This dataset provides information on the Climate-driven INFORM Risk Indicator, which helps assess the risk of climate-driven hazards. It can be used to support decisions related to prevention, preparedness, and response. It has three dimensions: climate-driven hazard & exposure, vulnerability, and lack of coping capacity. It is produced based on the INFORM Risk with IMF staff calculations. Climate-driven Hazard & Exposure reflects the probability of physical exposure associated with specific climate-driven hazards. Vulnerability represents economic, political and social characteristics of the community that can be destabilized in case of a hazard event. Lack of coping capacity relates to the ability of a country to cope with disasters in terms of formal, organized activities and the effort of the country’s government as well as the existing infrastructure which contribute to the reduction of disaster risk. The data are updated annually based on August data release by INFORM Risk.