Woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre in Belarus
Belarus: Woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre was 0.0002 ha per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre in Belarus, 1992–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in ha per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for woody savanna — burned area, per square kilometre in Belarus is 0.0002 ha per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
That represents a change of down 88.9% on the previous year and down 99.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, woody savanna — burned area, per square kilometre in Belarus peaked at 0.3027 ha per square kilometre in 2002 and was at its lowest, 0.0002 ha per square kilometre, in 2017.
That places Belarus 85th out of 187 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre in Belarus, year by year
| Year | ha per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1992 | 0.0423 ha per square kilometre | — |
| 1993 | 0.0423 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1994 | 0.0423 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1995 | 0.0423 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 0.0043 ha per square kilometre | -89.9% |
| 1997 | 0.0033 ha per square kilometre | -23.7% |
| 1998 | 0.0039 ha per square kilometre | +19.7% |
| 1999 | 0.0061 ha per square kilometre | +56.6% |
| 2000 | 0.0026 ha per square kilometre | -57.9% |
| 2001 | 0.0342 ha per square kilometre | +1226.7% |
| 2002 | 0.3027 ha per square kilometre | +784.8% |
| 2003 | 0.1532 ha per square kilometre | -49.4% |
| 2004 | 0.0267 ha per square kilometre | -82.6% |
| 2005 | 0.0345 ha per square kilometre | +29.4% |
| 2006 | 0.1371 ha per square kilometre | +297.1% |
| 2007 | 0.0127 ha per square kilometre | -90.7% |
| 2008 | 0.0085 ha per square kilometre | -33.3% |
| 2009 | 0.0139 ha per square kilometre | +63.7% |
| 2010 | 0.0114 ha per square kilometre | -18.3% |
| 2011 | 0.0019 ha per square kilometre | -83.2% |
| 2012 | 0.0935 ha per square kilometre | +4788.5% |
| 2013 | 0.0231 ha per square kilometre | -75.3% |
| 2014 | 0.0416 ha per square kilometre | +80.6% |
| 2015 | 0.1737 ha per square kilometre | +317.3% |
| 2016 | 0.0046 ha per square kilometre | -97.4% |
| 2017 | 0.0002 ha per square kilometre | -95.4% |
| 2018 | 0.0773 ha per square kilometre | +36318.4% |
| 2019 | 0.0203 ha per square kilometre | -73.8% |
| 2020 | 0.0269 ha per square kilometre | +32.4% |
| 2021 | 0.003 ha per square kilometre | -88.9% |
| 2022 | 0.0019 ha per square kilometre | -35.7% |
| 2023 | 0.0002 ha per square kilometre | -88.9% |
Belarus compared with similar countries
- Belarus's 0.0002 ha per square kilometre is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0.0023 ha per square kilometre, 9% of the median. (52 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre in Belarus changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | +36318.4% | 0.0002 ha per square kilometre | 0.0773 ha per square kilometre |
| 2012 | +4788.5% | 0.0019 ha per square kilometre | 0.0935 ha per square kilometre |
| 2001 | +1226.7% | 0.0026 ha per square kilometre | 0.0342 ha per square kilometre |
| 2002 | +784.8% | 0.0342 ha per square kilometre | 0.3027 ha per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0234 ha per square kilometre | 0.0033 ha per square kilometre | 0.0423 ha per square kilometre | 8 |
| 2000s | 0.0726 ha per square kilometre | 0.0026 ha per square kilometre | 0.3027 ha per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0447 ha per square kilometre | 0.0002 ha per square kilometre | 0.1737 ha per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.008 ha per square kilometre | 0.0002 ha per square kilometre | 0.0269 ha per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
- 82 Ukraine 0.0007 ha per square kilometre compare
- 83 Croatia 0.0004 ha per square kilometre compare
- 84 Morocco 0.0003 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Aruba 0 ha per square kilometre
- 86 Afghanistan 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Andorra 0 ha per square kilometre
- 86 United Arab Emirates 0 ha per square kilometre
- 86 Armenia 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 American Samoa 0 ha per square kilometre
- 86 Antigua and Barbuda 0 ha per square kilometre
- 86 Austria 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Azerbaijan 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Burundi 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Belgium 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Benin 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Burkina Faso 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Bahrain 0 ha per square kilometre
- 86 Bermuda 0 ha per square kilometre
- 86 Barbados 0 ha per square kilometre
- 86 Botswana 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Switzerland 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Comoros 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Cayman Islands 0 ha per square kilometre
- 86 Cyprus 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Czechia 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Germany 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Djibouti 0 ha per square kilometre
- 86 Dominica 0 ha per square kilometre
- 86 Denmark 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Egypt 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Eritrea 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Finland 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Faroe Islands 0 ha per square kilometre
- 86 Gibraltar 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Gambia 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Grenada 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Greenland 0 ha per square kilometre
- 86 Guam 0 ha per square kilometre
- 86 Hungary 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Isle of Man 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Ireland 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Iraq 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Iceland 0 ha per square kilometre
- 86 Israel 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Jordan 0 ha per square kilometre
- 86 Kazakhstan 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Kyrgyzstan 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Kiribati 0 ha per square kilometre
- 86 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0 ha per square kilometre
- 86 Kuwait 0 ha per square kilometre
- 86 Lebanon 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Libya 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Saint Lucia 0 ha per square kilometre
- 86 Liechtenstein 0 ha per square kilometre
- 86 Lesotho 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Lithuania 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Luxembourg 0 ha per square kilometre
- 86 Latvia 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Maldives 0 ha per square kilometre
- 86 Marshall Islands 0 ha per square kilometre
- 86 Mali 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Malta 0 ha per square kilometre
- 86 Montenegro 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Mongolia 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Northern Mariana Islands 0 ha per square kilometre
- 86 Mauritania 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Mauritius 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Namibia 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Niger 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Norway 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 New Zealand 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Oman 0 ha per square kilometre
- 86 Pakistan 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Palau 0 ha per square kilometre
- 86 Poland 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Puerto Rico 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Palestine 0 ha per square kilometre
- 86 French Polynesia 0 ha per square kilometre
- 86 Qatar 0 ha per square kilometre
- 86 Saudi Arabia 0 ha per square kilometre
- 86 Sudan 0 ha per square kilometre
- 86 Senegal 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Singapore 0 ha per square kilometre
- 86 Solomon Islands 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 San Marino 0 ha per square kilometre
- 86 Somalia 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Serbia 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Slovakia 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Slovenia 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Sweden 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Seychelles 0 ha per square kilometre
- 86 Turks and Caicos Islands 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Chad 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Tajikistan 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Turkmenistan 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Tonga 0 ha per square kilometre
- 86 Trinidad and Tobago 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Tuvalu 0 ha per square kilometre
- 86 Uzbekistan 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0 ha per square kilometre
- 86 British Virgin Islands 0 ha per square kilometre
- 86 United States Virgin Islands 0 ha per square kilometre
- 86 Vanuatu 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Samoa 0 ha per square kilometre
- 86 Yemen 0 ha per square kilometre
More climate change data for Belarus
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 644.33 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 12,124 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 2,377 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 9,748 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 8.97 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 348.13 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 4,092 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 4,078 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 14.36 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 15.39 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is woody savanna — burned area, per square kilometre in Belarus?
- Woody savanna — burned area, per square kilometre in Belarus was 0.0002 ha per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest woody savanna — burned area, per square kilometre recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was 0.3027 ha per square kilometre in 2002.
- What is the lowest woody savanna — burned area, per square kilometre recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0002 ha per square kilometre in 2017.
- How does Belarus rank for woody savanna — burned area, per square kilometre?
- Belarus ranks 85th out of 187 countries with data for 2023.
- Is woody savanna — burned area, per square kilometre rising or falling in Belarus?
- Over the last ten years it is down 99.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 32 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Woody savanna — Burned Area divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Woody savanna — Burned Area ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Woody savanna — Burned Area Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Woody savanna — Burned Area divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.