Woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre in Poland
Poland: Woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre was 0 ha per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre in Poland, 1990–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in ha per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for woody savanna — burned area, per square kilometre in Poland is 0 ha per square kilometre, measured in 2023. That is the lowest value across all 34 years on record.
The figure is down 100.0% on the previous year and down 100.0% over five years.
Over the whole period, woody savanna — burned area, per square kilometre in Poland peaked at 0.0056 ha per square kilometre in 2003 and was at its lowest, 0 ha per square kilometre, in 2007.
Poland ranks 86th of 187 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre in Poland, year by year
| Year | ha per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1990 | 0.0006 ha per square kilometre | — |
| 1991 | 0.0006 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 0.0006 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1993 | 0.0006 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1994 | 0.0006 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1995 | 0.0006 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 0 ha per square kilometre | -97.5% |
| 1997 | 0 ha per square kilometre | -23.0% |
| 1998 | 0 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 0 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 0 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2001 | 0.0013 ha per square kilometre | +11198.1% |
| 2002 | 0.0005 ha per square kilometre | -61.1% |
| 2003 | 0.0056 ha per square kilometre | +1028.4% |
| 2004 | 0.0003 ha per square kilometre | -94.9% |
| 2005 | 0.0039 ha per square kilometre | +1299.5% |
| 2006 | 0.0002 ha per square kilometre | -94.6% |
| 2007 | 0 ha per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 2008 | 0.0004 ha per square kilometre | — |
| 2009 | 0.0004 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 0.0004 ha per square kilometre | +20.0% |
| 2011 | 0.0008 ha per square kilometre | +83.3% |
| 2012 | 0.0014 ha per square kilometre | +81.8% |
| 2013 | 0 ha per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 2014 | 0 ha per square kilometre | — |
| 2015 | 0.0006 ha per square kilometre | — |
| 2016 | 0 ha per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 2017 | 0.0004 ha per square kilometre | — |
| 2018 | 0.0006 ha per square kilometre | +60.1% |
| 2019 | 0.0001 ha per square kilometre | -87.5% |
| 2020 | 0 ha per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 2021 | 0 ha per square kilometre | — |
| 2022 | 0.0004 ha per square kilometre | — |
| 2023 | 0 ha per square kilometre | -100.0% |
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre in Poland changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 | +11198.1% | 0 ha per square kilometre | 0.0013 ha per square kilometre |
| 2005 | +1299.5% | 0.0003 ha per square kilometre | 0.0039 ha per square kilometre |
| 2003 | +1028.4% | 0.0005 ha per square kilometre | 0.0056 ha per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0004 ha per square kilometre | 0 ha per square kilometre | 0.0006 ha per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0012 ha per square kilometre | 0 ha per square kilometre | 0.0056 ha per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0004 ha per square kilometre | 0 ha per square kilometre | 0.0014 ha per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0001 ha per square kilometre | 0 ha per square kilometre | 0.0004 ha per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Poland
- 83 Croatia 0.0004 ha per square kilometre compare
- 84 Morocco 0.0003 ha per square kilometre compare
- 85 Belarus 0.0002 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Aruba 0 ha per square kilometre
- 86 Afghanistan 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Andorra 0 ha per square kilometre
- 86 United Arab Emirates 0 ha per square kilometre
- 86 Armenia 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 American Samoa 0 ha per square kilometre
- 86 Antigua and Barbuda 0 ha per square kilometre
- 86 Austria 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Azerbaijan 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Burundi 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Belgium 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Benin 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Burkina Faso 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Bahrain 0 ha per square kilometre
- 86 Bermuda 0 ha per square kilometre
- 86 Barbados 0 ha per square kilometre
- 86 Botswana 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Switzerland 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Comoros 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Cayman Islands 0 ha per square kilometre
- 86 Cyprus 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Czechia 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Germany 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Djibouti 0 ha per square kilometre
- 86 Dominica 0 ha per square kilometre
- 86 Denmark 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Egypt 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Eritrea 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Finland 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Faroe Islands 0 ha per square kilometre
- 86 Gibraltar 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Gambia 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Grenada 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Greenland 0 ha per square kilometre
- 86 Guam 0 ha per square kilometre
- 86 Hungary 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Isle of Man 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Ireland 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Iraq 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Iceland 0 ha per square kilometre
- 86 Israel 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Jordan 0 ha per square kilometre
- 86 Kazakhstan 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Kyrgyzstan 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Kiribati 0 ha per square kilometre
- 86 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0 ha per square kilometre
- 86 Kuwait 0 ha per square kilometre
- 86 Lebanon 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Libya 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Saint Lucia 0 ha per square kilometre
- 86 Liechtenstein 0 ha per square kilometre
- 86 Lesotho 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Lithuania 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Luxembourg 0 ha per square kilometre
- 86 Latvia 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Maldives 0 ha per square kilometre
- 86 Marshall Islands 0 ha per square kilometre
- 86 Mali 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Malta 0 ha per square kilometre
- 86 Montenegro 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Mongolia 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Northern Mariana Islands 0 ha per square kilometre
- 86 Mauritania 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Mauritius 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Namibia 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Niger 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Norway 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 New Zealand 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Oman 0 ha per square kilometre
- 86 Pakistan 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Palau 0 ha per square kilometre
- 86 Puerto Rico 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Palestine 0 ha per square kilometre
- 86 French Polynesia 0 ha per square kilometre
- 86 Qatar 0 ha per square kilometre
- 86 Saudi Arabia 0 ha per square kilometre
- 86 Sudan 0 ha per square kilometre
- 86 Senegal 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Singapore 0 ha per square kilometre
- 86 Solomon Islands 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 San Marino 0 ha per square kilometre
- 86 Somalia 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Serbia 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Slovakia 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Slovenia 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Sweden 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Seychelles 0 ha per square kilometre
- 86 Turks and Caicos Islands 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Chad 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Tajikistan 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Turkmenistan 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Tonga 0 ha per square kilometre
- 86 Trinidad and Tobago 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Tuvalu 0 ha per square kilometre
- 86 Uzbekistan 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0 ha per square kilometre
- 86 British Virgin Islands 0 ha per square kilometre
- 86 United States Virgin Islands 0 ha per square kilometre
- 86 Vanuatu 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Samoa 0 ha per square kilometre
- 86 Yemen 0 ha per square kilometre
More climate change data for Poland
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 1.05 billion kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 19,935 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 4,534 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 15,401 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 17.11 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 550.03 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 7,175 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 7,089 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 86.67 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 26.75 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is woody savanna — burned area, per square kilometre in Poland?
- Woody savanna — burned area, per square kilometre in Poland was 0 ha per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest woody savanna — burned area, per square kilometre recorded in Poland?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0056 ha per square kilometre in 2003.
- What is the lowest woody savanna — burned area, per square kilometre recorded in Poland?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 ha per square kilometre in 2007.
- How does Poland rank for woody savanna — burned area, per square kilometre?
- Poland ranks 86th out of 187 countries with data for 2023.
- Where does this Poland data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 34 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Woody savanna — Burned Area divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Woody savanna — Burned Area ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Woody savanna — Burned Area Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Woody savanna — Burned Area divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.