Martinique vs Réunion: AFOLU — Emissions
AFOLU — Emissions over time
- Martinique
- Réunion
How they compare
Martinique currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Réunion, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Martinique ahead.
Martinique ranks 191st and Réunion ranks 191st of 221 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Martinique averaged higher in 1 and Réunion in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Martinique | Réunion | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.25 kt | 1.64 kt | 0.6089 kt | Martinique |
| 2000s | 1.17 kt | 1.47 kt | 0.3049 kt | Réunion |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0.0112 kt | 0.0112 kt | Réunion |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions, Martinique or Réunion?
- Martinique, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Réunion as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions between Martinique and Réunion?
- 0 kt, with Martinique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Martinique and Réunion?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Martinique and Réunion rank globally for afolu — emissions?
- Martinique ranks 191st and Réunion ranks 191st of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf