Panama vs Tunisia: AFOLU — Emissions
AFOLU — Emissions over time
- Panama
- Tunisia
How they compare
Panama currently reports 94.75 kt against 81.86 kt in Tunisia, a difference of 12.89 kt.
That makes Panama's figure about 1.2 times Tunisia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Panama ahead.
Panama ranks 106th and Tunisia ranks 109th of 221 countries.
Panama has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Panama | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 88.6 kt | 84.83 kt | 3.78 kt | Panama |
| 2000s | 96.18 kt | 93.39 kt | 2.79 kt | Panama |
| 2010s | 100.25 kt | 87.45 kt | 12.8 kt | Panama |
| 2020s | 94.19 kt | 82.68 kt | 11.51 kt | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions, Panama or Tunisia?
- Panama, at 94.75 kt against 81.86 kt in Tunisia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions between Panama and Tunisia?
- 12.89 kt, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Tunisia?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Panama and Tunisia rank globally for afolu — emissions?
- Panama ranks 106th and Tunisia ranks 109th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf