Peru vs Uruguay: AFOLU — Emissions
AFOLU — Emissions over time
- Peru
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 770.37 kt against 729.45 kt in Peru, a difference of 40.92 kt.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.1 times Peru's.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Uruguay has been ahead every year.
Peru ranks 40th and Uruguay ranks 38th of 216 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 532.9 kt | 743.2 kt | 210.3 kt | Uruguay |
| 2000s | 653.91 kt | 795.71 kt | 141.8 kt | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 705.5 kt | 772.73 kt | 67.23 kt | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 724.31 kt | 757.77 kt | 33.46 kt | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions, Peru or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 770.37 kt against 729.45 kt in Peru as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions between Peru and Uruguay?
- 40.92 kt, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Uruguay?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Peru and Uruguay rank globally for afolu — emissions?
- Peru ranks 40th and Uruguay ranks 38th of 216 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf