Belgium-Luxembourg vs Serbia and Montenegro: AFOLU — Emissions
AFOLU — Emissions over time
- Belgium-Luxembourg
- Serbia and Montenegro
How they compare
Belgium-Luxembourg currently reports 13.57 kt against 12.56 kt in Serbia and Montenegro, a difference of 1.01 kt.
That makes Belgium-Luxembourg's figure about 1.1 times Serbia and Montenegro's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belgium-Luxembourg ahead.
Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 80th and Serbia and Montenegro ranks 82nd of 222 countries.
Belgium-Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions, Belgium-Luxembourg or Serbia and Montenegro?
- Belgium-Luxembourg, at 13.57 kt against 12.56 kt in Serbia and Montenegro as of 1999.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions between Belgium-Luxembourg and Serbia and Montenegro?
- 1.01 kt, with Belgium-Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium-Luxembourg and Serbia and Montenegro?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 1999.
- How do Belgium-Luxembourg and Serbia and Montenegro rank globally for afolu — emissions?
- Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 80th and Serbia and Montenegro ranks 82nd of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf