Croatia vs Moldova: AFOLU — Emissions
AFOLU — Emissions over time
- Croatia
- Moldova
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 3.86 kt against 3.43 kt in Moldova, a difference of 0.43 kt.
That makes Croatia's figure about 1.1 times Moldova's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Croatia ahead.
Croatia ranks 143rd and Moldova ranks 144th of 257 countries.
Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4.89 kt | 3.87 kt | 1.02 kt | Croatia |
| 2000s | 5.62 kt | 2.48 kt | 3.14 kt | Croatia |
| 2010s | 4.34 kt | 2.81 kt | 1.52 kt | Croatia |
| 2020s | 4.18 kt | 3.05 kt | 1.13 kt | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher afolu — emissions, Croatia or Moldova?
- Croatia, at 3.86 kt against 3.43 kt in Moldova as of 2023.
- What is the difference in afolu — emissions between Croatia and Moldova?
- 0.43 kt, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Moldova?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Croatia and Moldova rank globally for afolu — emissions?
- Croatia ranks 143rd and Moldova ranks 144th of 257 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as AFOLU — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf