Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha vs Mayotte: Agrifood systems — Emissions

Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha
0.0001 kt
in 2023
Mayotte
0 kt
in 2023
Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha rank
217th
Mayotte rank
218th

Agrifood systems — Emissions over time

  • Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha
  • Mayotte
00.0020.0040.006199020062023

How they compare

Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha currently reports 0.0001 kt against 0 kt in Mayotte, a difference of 0.0001 kt.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Mayotte ahead.

Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha ranks 217th and Mayotte ranks 218th of 222 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha averaged higher in 1 and Mayotte in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha Mayotte Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0001 kt 0.003 kt 0.0029 kt Mayotte
2000s 0.0001 kt 0.0015 kt 0.0014 kt Mayotte
2010s 0.0001 kt 0.0002 kt 0.0001 kt Mayotte
2020s 0.0001 kt 0 kt 0.0001 kt Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agrifood systems — emissions, Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha or Mayotte?
Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha, at 0.0001 kt against 0 kt in Mayotte as of 2023.
What is the difference in agrifood systems — emissions between Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha and Mayotte?
0.0001 kt, with Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha and Mayotte?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha and Mayotte rank globally for agrifood systems — emissions?
Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha ranks 217th and Mayotte ranks 218th of 222 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agrifood systems — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha vs Mayotte: Agrifood systems — Emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/agrifood-systems-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/ascension-saint-helena-and-tristan-da-cunha/mayotte/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/agrifood-systems-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/ascension-saint-helena-and-tristan-da-cunha/mayotte/">Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha vs Mayotte: Agrifood systems — Emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agrifood systems — Emissions (CH4)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
276 places, 9,163 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf