Iceland vs Mayotte: Agrifood systems — Emissions Share
Iceland
108.1 %
in 2023
Mayotte
600 %
in 1999
Iceland rank
2nd
Mayotte rank
1st
Agrifood systems — Emissions Share over time
- Iceland
- Mayotte
How they compare
Mayotte currently reports 600 % against 108.1 % in Iceland, a difference of 491.9 %.
That makes Mayotte's figure about 5.6 times Iceland's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Mayotte has been ahead every year.
Iceland ranks 2nd and Mayotte ranks 1st of 209 countries.
Mayotte has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agrifood systems — emissions share, Iceland or Mayotte?
- Mayotte, at 600 % against 108.1 % in Iceland as of 1999.
- What is the difference in agrifood systems — emissions share between Iceland and Mayotte?
- 491.9 %, with Mayotte ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Mayotte?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 1999.
- How do Iceland and Mayotte rank globally for agrifood systems — emissions share?
- Iceland ranks 2nd and Mayotte ranks 1st of 209 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agrifood systems — Emissions Share (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions indicators disseminates indicators on sectoral shares of total national greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions as well as three indicators of emissions intensity: per capita emissions; emissions per value of agricultural production; and emissions per area of agricultural land.