Canada vs Democratic Republic of Congo: Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled

Canada
645.29 million tonnes
in 2024
Democratic Republic of Congo
654.10 million tonnes
in 2024
Canada rank
11th
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
10th

Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled over time

  • Canada
  • Democratic Republic of Congo
0250.0M500.0M750.0M1.0B185019372024

How they compare

Democratic Republic of Congo currently reports 654.10 million tonnes against 645.29 million tonnes in Canada, a difference of 8.81 million tonnes.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 105 shared years of data; in 1920 it was Canada ahead.

Canada ranks 11th and Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 10th of 194 countries.

Across the 11 decades both report, Canada averaged higher in 9 and Democratic Republic of Congo in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada Democratic Republic of Congo Difference Ahead
1920s 419.17 million tonnes 49.67 million tonnes 369.50 million tonnes Canada
1930s 397.01 million tonnes 100.49 million tonnes 296.53 million tonnes Canada
1940s 405.39 million tonnes 169.39 million tonnes 236.01 million tonnes Canada
1950s 584.62 million tonnes 314.08 million tonnes 270.54 million tonnes Canada
1960s 593.28 million tonnes 222.62 million tonnes 370.66 million tonnes Canada
1970s 648.90 million tonnes 101.27 million tonnes 547.63 million tonnes Canada
1980s 683.56 million tonnes 99.02 million tonnes 584.54 million tonnes Canada
1990s 729.25 million tonnes 138.34 million tonnes 590.92 million tonnes Canada
2000s 782.12 million tonnes 260.30 million tonnes 521.82 million tonnes Canada
2010s 703.04 million tonnes 809.55 million tonnes 106.51 million tonnes Democratic Republic of Congo
2020s 658.58 million tonnes 677.69 million tonnes 19.12 million tonnes Democratic Republic of Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher annual co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled, Canada or Democratic Republic of Congo?
Democratic Republic of Congo, at 654.10 million tonnes against 645.29 million tonnes in Canada as of 2024.
What is the difference in annual co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled between Canada and Democratic Republic of Congo?
8.81 million tonnes, with Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Democratic Republic of Congo?
105 years are reported by both, from 1920 to 2024.
How do Canada and Democratic Republic of Congo rank globally for annual co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled?
Canada ranks 11th and Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 10th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Canada vs Democratic Republic of Congo: Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/annual-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-gaps-filled/canada/congo-dem-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/annual-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-gaps-filled/canada/congo-dem-rep/">Canada vs Democratic Republic of Congo: Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled
Unit
tonnes
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 21,015 data points, 1850–2024
Last refreshed

Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change with 79 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.