Costa Rica vs Estonia: Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled

Costa Rica
7.77 million tonnes
in 2024
Estonia
8.10 million tonnes
in 2024
Costa Rica rank
141st
Estonia rank
138th

Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Estonia
020.0M40.0M60.0M185019372024

How they compare

Estonia currently reports 8.10 million tonnes against 7.77 million tonnes in Costa Rica, a difference of 325,070 tonnes.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 155 shared years of data; in 1870 it was Estonia ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 141st and Estonia ranks 138th of 194 countries.

Across the 16 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 9 and Estonia in 7.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Estonia Difference Ahead
1870s 4.50 million tonnes 6.75 million tonnes 2.25 million tonnes Estonia
1880s 4.56 million tonnes 5.31 million tonnes 746,276 tonnes Estonia
1890s 6.50 million tonnes 4.36 million tonnes 2.14 million tonnes Costa Rica
1900s 7.40 million tonnes 3.99 million tonnes 3.41 million tonnes Costa Rica
1910s 8.54 million tonnes 3.40 million tonnes 5.14 million tonnes Costa Rica
1920s 6.93 million tonnes 2.59 million tonnes 4.34 million tonnes Costa Rica
1930s 17.15 million tonnes 4.21 million tonnes 12.94 million tonnes Costa Rica
1940s 28.78 million tonnes 3.94 million tonnes 24.84 million tonnes Costa Rica
1950s 32.51 million tonnes 7.28 million tonnes 25.23 million tonnes Costa Rica
1960s 29.73 million tonnes 11.45 million tonnes 18.27 million tonnes Costa Rica
1970s 43.62 million tonnes 25.14 million tonnes 18.48 million tonnes Costa Rica
1980s 27.09 million tonnes 34.63 million tonnes 7.53 million tonnes Estonia
1990s 7.34 million tonnes 18.50 million tonnes 11.16 million tonnes Estonia
2000s 9.96 million tonnes 12.60 million tonnes 2.63 million tonnes Estonia
2010s 10.37 million tonnes 16.03 million tonnes 5.66 million tonnes Estonia
2020s 7.15 million tonnes 9.09 million tonnes 1.94 million tonnes Estonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher annual co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled, Costa Rica or Estonia?
Estonia, at 8.10 million tonnes against 7.77 million tonnes in Costa Rica as of 2024.
What is the difference in annual co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled between Costa Rica and Estonia?
325,070 tonnes, with Estonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Estonia?
155 years are reported by both, from 1870 to 2024.
How do Costa Rica and Estonia rank globally for annual co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled?
Costa Rica ranks 141st and Estonia ranks 138th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Estonia: Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/annual-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-gaps-filled/costa-rica/estonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/annual-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-gaps-filled/costa-rica/estonia/">Costa Rica vs Estonia: Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled
Unit
tonnes
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 21,015 data points, 1850–2024
Last refreshed

Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change with 79 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.