Hong Kong vs North Macedonia: Year-to-year change in primary energy from fossil fuels vs.

Hong Kong
0.5633 terawatt-hours
in 2025
North Macedonia
1.11 terawatt-hours
in 2025
Hong Kong rank
44th
North Macedonia rank
42nd

Year-to-year change in primary energy from fossil fuels vs. over time

  • Hong Kong
  • North Macedonia
-1-0.500.51196619952025

How they compare

North Macedonia currently reports 1.11 terawatt-hours against 0.5633 terawatt-hours in Hong Kong, a difference of 0.5467 terawatt-hours.

That makes North Macedonia's figure about 2.0 times Hong Kong's.

The two have swapped places 16 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was North Macedonia ahead.

Hong Kong ranks 44th and North Macedonia ranks 42nd of 80 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Hong Kong averaged higher in 3 and North Macedonia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong North Macedonia Difference Ahead
1990s 0 terawatt-hours 0.0998 terawatt-hours 0.0998 terawatt-hours North Macedonia
2000s 0.0001 terawatt-hours -0.0097 terawatt-hours 0.0098 terawatt-hours Hong Kong
2010s 0.0838 terawatt-hours 0.0165 terawatt-hours 0.0673 terawatt-hours Hong Kong
2020s 0.3872 terawatt-hours 0.3764 terawatt-hours 0.0108 terawatt-hours Hong Kong

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher year-to-year change in primary energy from fossil fuels vs. low-carbon energy, Hong Kong or North Macedonia?
North Macedonia, at 1.11 terawatt-hours against 0.5633 terawatt-hours in Hong Kong as of 2025.
What is the difference in year-to-year change in primary energy from fossil fuels vs. low-carbon energy between Hong Kong and North Macedonia?
0.5467 terawatt-hours, with North Macedonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and North Macedonia?
35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do Hong Kong and North Macedonia rank globally for year-to-year change in primary energy from fossil fuels vs. low-carbon energy?
Hong Kong ranks 44th and North Macedonia ranks 42nd of 80 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Energy Institute – Statistical Review of World Energy (2026) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Year-to-year change in primary energy from fossil fuels vs. low-carbon energy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong vs North Macedonia: Year-to-year change in primary energy from fossil fuels vs. low-carbon energy. Statizoid, drawing on Energy Institute – Statistical Review of World Energy (2026) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/annual-primary-energy-fossil-vs-low-carbon/hong-kong-sar-china/north-macedonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/annual-primary-energy-fossil-vs-low-carbon/hong-kong-sar-china/north-macedonia/">Hong Kong vs North Macedonia: Year-to-year change in primary energy from fossil fuels vs. low-carbon energy</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Year-to-year change in primary energy from fossil fuels vs. low-carbon energy
Unit
terawatt-hours
Source
Energy Institute – Statistical Review of World Energy (2026) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
82 places, 4,598 data points, 1966–2025
Last refreshed

Change in total energy supply relative to the previous year, measured in terawatt-hours.