Estonia vs Tunisia: Beans, dry — Crop residues
Beans, dry — Crop residues over time
- Estonia
- Tunisia
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Tunisia, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Tunisia ahead.
Estonia ranks 116th and Tunisia ranks 116th of 127 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 2 and Tunisia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0002 kt | 0.0003 kt | 0 kt | Tunisia |
| 2000s | 0.0001 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | Estonia |
| 2010s | 0.0022 kt | 0 kt | 0.0022 kt | Estonia |
| 2030s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2050s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beans, dry — crop residues, Estonia or Tunisia?
- Estonia, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Tunisia as of 2050.
- What is the difference in beans, dry — crop residues between Estonia and Tunisia?
- 0 kt, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Tunisia?
- 28 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2050.
- How do Estonia and Tunisia rank globally for beans, dry — crop residues?
- Estonia ranks 116th and Tunisia ranks 116th of 127 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Beans, dry — Crop residues (Emissions N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).