Cuba vs Yugoslav SFR: Beans, dry — Crop residues
Beans, dry — Crop residues over time
- Cuba
- Yugoslav SFR
How they compare
Yugoslav SFR currently reports 0.0075 kt against 0.0058 kt in Cuba, a difference of 0.0017 kt.
That makes Yugoslav SFR's figure about 1.3 times Cuba's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Yugoslav SFR has been ahead every year.
Cuba ranks 29th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 28th of 127 countries.
Yugoslav SFR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Yugoslav SFR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.002 kt | 0.0216 kt | 0.0197 kt | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1970s | 0.0008 kt | 0.0072 kt | 0.0064 kt | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1980s | 0.0013 kt | 0.0065 kt | 0.0052 kt | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1990s | 0.0015 kt | 0.0062 kt | 0.0047 kt | Yugoslav SFR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beans, dry — crop residues, Cuba or Yugoslav SFR?
- Yugoslav SFR, at 0.0075 kt against 0.0058 kt in Cuba as of 1991.
- What is the difference in beans, dry — crop residues between Cuba and Yugoslav SFR?
- 0.0017 kt, with Yugoslav SFR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Yugoslav SFR?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do Cuba and Yugoslav SFR rank globally for beans, dry — crop residues?
- Cuba ranks 29th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 28th of 127 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Beans, dry — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).