Australia and New Zealand vs Honduras: Carbon stock change in forests — Net emissions/removals (CO2)

Australia and New Zealand
-22,983 kt
in 2025
Honduras
-28,534 kt
in 2025
Australia and New Zealand rank
207th
Honduras rank
210th

Carbon stock change in forests — Net emissions/removals (CO2) over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Honduras
-40.0k-20.0k020.0k40.0k60.0k199020072025

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports -22,983 kt against -28,534 kt in Honduras, a difference of 5,551 kt.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 207th and Honduras ranks 210th of 223 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 2 and Honduras in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Honduras Difference Ahead
1990s 25,399 kt 4,435 kt 20,964 kt Australia and New Zealand
2000s 35,368 kt -16,725 kt 52,093 kt Australia and New Zealand
2010s -33,780 kt -81.57 kt 33,698 kt Honduras
2020s -25,175 kt -14,807 kt 10,368 kt Honduras

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon stock change in forests — net emissions/removals (co2), Australia and New Zealand or Honduras?
Australia and New Zealand, at -22,983 kt against -28,534 kt in Honduras as of 2025.
What is the difference in carbon stock change in forests — net emissions/removals (co2) between Australia and New Zealand and Honduras?
5,551 kt, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Honduras?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Honduras rank globally for carbon stock change in forests — net emissions/removals (co2)?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 207th and Honduras ranks 210th of 223 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Carbon stock change in forests — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Honduras: Carbon stock change in forests — Net emissions/removals (CO2). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-stock-change-in-forests-net-emissions-removals-co2-forest-land-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/honduras/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-stock-change-in-forests-net-emissions-removals-co2-forest-land-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/honduras/">Australia and New Zealand vs Honduras: Carbon stock change in forests — Net emissions/removals (CO2)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon stock change in forests — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
275 places, 9,600 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Forests consists of CO2 emissions and removals corresponding to forest carbon stock changes (aboveground and belowground living biomass). Estimates are computed following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (IPCC, 2006).