Australia and New Zealand vs Philippines: Carbon stock change in forests — Net emissions/removals (CO2)

Australia and New Zealand
-22,983 kt
in 2025
Philippines
-26,943 kt
in 2025
Australia and New Zealand rank
207th
Philippines rank
209th

Carbon stock change in forests — Net emissions/removals (CO2) over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Philippines
-40.0k-20.0k020.0k40.0k199020072025

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports -22,983 kt against -26,943 kt in Philippines, a difference of 3,960 kt.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 207th and Philippines ranks 209th of 223 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 3 and Philippines in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Philippines Difference Ahead
1990s 25,399 kt 2,394 kt 23,005 kt Australia and New Zealand
2000s 35,368 kt -10,931 kt 46,299 kt Australia and New Zealand
2010s -33,780 kt -19,870 kt 13,909 kt Philippines
2020s -25,175 kt -25,901 kt 726 kt Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon stock change in forests — net emissions/removals (co2), Australia and New Zealand or Philippines?
Australia and New Zealand, at -22,983 kt against -26,943 kt in Philippines as of 2025.
What is the difference in carbon stock change in forests — net emissions/removals (co2) between Australia and New Zealand and Philippines?
3,960 kt, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Philippines?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Philippines rank globally for carbon stock change in forests — net emissions/removals (co2)?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 207th and Philippines ranks 209th of 223 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Carbon stock change in forests — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Philippines: Carbon stock change in forests — Net emissions/removals (CO2). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-stock-change-in-forests-net-emissions-removals-co2-forest-land-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/philippines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-stock-change-in-forests-net-emissions-removals-co2-forest-land-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/philippines/">Australia and New Zealand vs Philippines: Carbon stock change in forests — Net emissions/removals (CO2)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon stock change in forests — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
275 places, 9,600 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Forests consists of CO2 emissions and removals corresponding to forest carbon stock changes (aboveground and belowground living biomass). Estimates are computed following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (IPCC, 2006).