Mauritania vs Other small states: CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average (1=low)
CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average (1=low) over time
- Mauritania
- Other small states
How they compare
Mauritania currently reports 3.4 1=low to 6=high against 3.02 1=low to 6=high in Other small states, a difference of 0.38 1=low to 6=high.
That makes Mauritania's figure about 1.1 times Other small states's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Other small states ahead.
Mauritania ranks 20th and Other small states ranks 17th of 85 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Mauritania averaged higher in 2 and Other small states in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritania | Other small states | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.96 1=low to 6=high | 3.17 1=low to 6=high | 0.2129 1=low to 6=high | Other small states |
| 2010s | 3.18 1=low to 6=high | 3.15 1=low to 6=high | 0.0286 1=low to 6=high | Mauritania |
| 2020s | 3.33 1=low to 6=high | 3.13 1=low to 6=high | 0.2068 1=low to 6=high | Mauritania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average, Mauritania or Other small states?
- Mauritania, at 3.4 1=low to 6=high against 3.02 1=low to 6=high in Other small states as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average between Mauritania and Other small states?
- 0.38 1=low to 6=high, with Mauritania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Other small states?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Mauritania and Other small states rank globally for cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average?
- Mauritania ranks 20th and Other small states ranks 17th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Public Sector Management and Institutions cluster includes property rights and rule-based governance, quality of budgetary and financial management, efficiency of revenue mobilization, quality of public administration, and transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector.