Latvia vs South Sudan: Crop Residues — Indirect emissions
Crop Residues — Indirect emissions over time
- Latvia
- South Sudan
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0.0673 kt against 0.0643 kt in South Sudan, a difference of 0.003 kt.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 101st and South Sudan ranks 102nd of 183 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.1107 kt | 0.0532 kt | 0.0575 kt | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0.1346 kt | 0.0573 kt | 0.0774 kt | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residues — indirect emissions, Latvia or South Sudan?
- Latvia, at 0.0673 kt against 0.0643 kt in South Sudan as of 2050.
- What is the difference in crop residues — indirect emissions between Latvia and South Sudan?
- 0.003 kt, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Latvia and South Sudan rank globally for crop residues — indirect emissions?
- Latvia ranks 101st and South Sudan ranks 102nd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop Residues — Indirect emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf