Belarus vs Chile: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change

Belarus
5.12 billion tonnes
in 2024
Chile
4.49 billion tonnes
in 2024
Belarus rank
33rd
Chile rank
36th

Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change over time

  • Belarus
  • Chile
02.0B4.0B6.0B185019372024

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 5.12 billion tonnes against 4.49 billion tonnes in Chile, a difference of 627.79 million tonnes.

That makes Belarus's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.

Across all 175 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 33rd and Chile ranks 36th of 197 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 18 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Chile Difference Ahead
1850s 213.28 million tonnes 49.73 million tonnes 163.54 million tonnes Belarus
1860s 603.66 million tonnes 161.11 million tonnes 442.55 million tonnes Belarus
1870s 1.00 billion tonnes 296.28 million tonnes 706.61 million tonnes Belarus
1880s 1.41 billion tonnes 457.15 million tonnes 952.83 million tonnes Belarus
1890s 1.82 billion tonnes 656.48 million tonnes 1.17 billion tonnes Belarus
1900s 2.24 billion tonnes 894.84 million tonnes 1.35 billion tonnes Belarus
1910s 2.65 billion tonnes 1.20 billion tonnes 1.45 billion tonnes Belarus
1920s 3.06 billion tonnes 1.55 billion tonnes 1.51 billion tonnes Belarus
1930s 3.46 billion tonnes 1.93 billion tonnes 1.54 billion tonnes Belarus
1940s 3.87 billion tonnes 2.33 billion tonnes 1.53 billion tonnes Belarus
1950s 4.19 billion tonnes 2.72 billion tonnes 1.47 billion tonnes Belarus
1960s 4.46 billion tonnes 3.10 billion tonnes 1.36 billion tonnes Belarus
1970s 4.67 billion tonnes 3.47 billion tonnes 1.20 billion tonnes Belarus
1980s 4.87 billion tonnes 3.68 billion tonnes 1.19 billion tonnes Belarus
1990s 5.01 billion tonnes 3.73 billion tonnes 1.29 billion tonnes Belarus
2000s 5.09 billion tonnes 3.91 billion tonnes 1.18 billion tonnes Belarus
2010s 5.12 billion tonnes 4.25 billion tonnes 873.06 million tonnes Belarus
2020s 5.13 billion tonnes 4.47 billion tonnes 660.87 million tonnes Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, Belarus or Chile?
Belarus, at 5.12 billion tonnes against 4.49 billion tonnes in Chile as of 2024.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change between Belarus and Chile?
627.79 million tonnes, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Chile?
175 years are reported by both, from 1850 to 2024.
How do Belarus and Chile rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change?
Belarus ranks 33rd and Chile ranks 36th of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Global Carbon Budget (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Chile: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change. Statizoid, drawing on Global Carbon Budget (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-land-use/belarus/chile/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-land-use/belarus/chile/">Belarus vs Chile: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change
Unit
tonnes
Source
Global Carbon Budget (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
197 places, 34,475 data points, 1850–2024
Last refreshed

Cumulative emissions of carbon dioxide (CO₂) from land-use change since the first year of available data, measured in tonnes.