Cumulative co2 land use in Chile
Chile: Cumulative co2 land use was 4.49 billion in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Cumulative co2 land use in Chile, 1850–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
Chile recorded 4.49 billion for cumulative co2 land use in 2024. That is the highest value across all 175 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 0.2% on the previous year and up 6.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cumulative co2 land use in Chile peaked at 4.49 billion in 2024 and was at its lowest, 7.26 million, in 1850.
That places Chile 36th out of 197 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Cumulative co2 land use in Chile, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1850 | 7.26 million | — |
| 1851 | 16.06 million | +121.1% |
| 1852 | 25.09 million | +56.2% |
| 1853 | 34.42 million | +37.2% |
| 1854 | 44.02 million | +27.9% |
| 1855 | 53.19 million | +20.8% |
| 1856 | 62.97 million | +18.4% |
| 1857 | 73.20 million | +16.2% |
| 1858 | 85.02 million | +16.1% |
| 1859 | 96.09 million | +13.0% |
| 1860 | 107.41 million | +11.8% |
| 1861 | 118.88 million | +10.7% |
| 1862 | 130.47 million | +9.8% |
| 1863 | 142.30 million | +9.1% |
| 1864 | 154.39 million | +8.5% |
| 1865 | 166.88 million | +8.1% |
| 1866 | 178.40 million | +6.9% |
| 1867 | 191.13 million | +7.1% |
| 1868 | 204.61 million | +7.1% |
| 1869 | 216.63 million | +5.9% |
| 1870 | 231.26 million | +6.8% |
| 1871 | 244.41 million | +5.7% |
| 1872 | 257.36 million | +5.3% |
| 1873 | 272.38 million | +5.8% |
| 1874 | 285.90 million | +5.0% |
| 1875 | 302.36 million | +5.8% |
| 1876 | 318.28 million | +5.3% |
| 1877 | 335.06 million | +5.3% |
| 1878 | 350.40 million | +4.6% |
| 1879 | 365.41 million | +4.3% |
| 1880 | 380.68 million | +4.2% |
| 1881 | 396.52 million | +4.2% |
| 1882 | 413.41 million | +4.3% |
| 1883 | 430.32 million | +4.1% |
| 1884 | 447.72 million | +4.0% |
| 1885 | 465.36 million | +3.9% |
| 1886 | 482.39 million | +3.7% |
| 1887 | 499.88 million | +3.6% |
| 1888 | 518.33 million | +3.7% |
| 1889 | 536.93 million | +3.6% |
| 1890 | 556.59 million | +3.7% |
| 1891 | 579.18 million | +4.1% |
| 1892 | 600.47 million | +3.7% |
| 1893 | 622.03 million | +3.6% |
| 1894 | 645.17 million | +3.7% |
| 1895 | 669.82 million | +3.8% |
| 1896 | 692.80 million | +3.4% |
| 1897 | 713.18 million | +2.9% |
| 1898 | 732.22 million | +2.7% |
| 1899 | 753.31 million | +2.9% |
| 1900 | 776.92 million | +3.1% |
| 1901 | 800.95 million | +3.1% |
| 1902 | 825.00 million | +3.0% |
| 1903 | 849.75 million | +3.0% |
| 1904 | 875.93 million | +3.1% |
| 1905 | 902.74 million | +3.1% |
| 1906 | 932.25 million | +3.3% |
| 1907 | 963.03 million | +3.3% |
| 1908 | 995.39 million | +3.4% |
| 1909 | 1.03 billion | +3.1% |
| 1910 | 1.06 billion | +3.3% |
| 1911 | 1.09 billion | +2.7% |
| 1912 | 1.12 billion | +2.6% |
| 1913 | 1.15 billion | +2.7% |
| 1914 | 1.18 billion | +2.9% |
| 1915 | 1.21 billion | +2.8% |
| 1916 | 1.25 billion | +3.1% |
| 1917 | 1.29 billion | +3.1% |
| 1918 | 1.32 billion | +2.7% |
| 1919 | 1.36 billion | +2.7% |
| 1920 | 1.40 billion | +2.6% |
| 1921 | 1.43 billion | +2.4% |
| 1922 | 1.46 billion | +2.3% |
| 1923 | 1.49 billion | +2.2% |
| 1924 | 1.53 billion | +2.2% |
| 1925 | 1.56 billion | +2.2% |
| 1926 | 1.59 billion | +2.1% |
| 1927 | 1.63 billion | +2.2% |
| 1928 | 1.67 billion | +2.3% |
| 1929 | 1.70 billion | +2.2% |
| 1930 | 1.74 billion | +2.3% |
| 1931 | 1.78 billion | +2.3% |
| 1932 | 1.83 billion | +2.5% |
| 1933 | 1.87 billion | +2.2% |
| 1934 | 1.91 billion | +2.2% |
| 1935 | 1.95 billion | +2.2% |
| 1936 | 1.99 billion | +2.2% |
| 1937 | 2.04 billion | +2.2% |
| 1938 | 2.08 billion | +2.0% |
| 1939 | 2.12 billion | +1.9% |
| 1940 | 2.16 billion | +1.9% |
| 1941 | 2.20 billion | +1.8% |
| 1942 | 2.23 billion | +1.7% |
| 1943 | 2.27 billion | +1.8% |
| 1944 | 2.31 billion | +1.8% |
| 1945 | 2.35 billion | +1.8% |
| 1946 | 2.39 billion | +1.6% |
| 1947 | 2.43 billion | +1.6% |
| 1948 | 2.47 billion | +1.6% |
| 1949 | 2.51 billion | +1.7% |
| 1950 | 2.55 billion | +1.5% |
| 1951 | 2.59 billion | +1.4% |
| 1952 | 2.62 billion | +1.4% |
| 1953 | 2.66 billion | +1.4% |
| 1954 | 2.69 billion | +1.4% |
| 1955 | 2.73 billion | +1.5% |
| 1956 | 2.77 billion | +1.5% |
| 1957 | 2.82 billion | +1.6% |
| 1958 | 2.86 billion | +1.5% |
| 1959 | 2.91 billion | +1.6% |
| 1960 | 2.95 billion | +1.5% |
| 1961 | 2.99 billion | +1.2% |
| 1962 | 3.02 billion | +1.2% |
| 1963 | 3.05 billion | +1.1% |
| 1964 | 3.09 billion | +1.1% |
| 1965 | 3.12 billion | +1.0% |
| 1966 | 3.15 billion | +1.0% |
| 1967 | 3.18 billion | +1.0% |
| 1968 | 3.21 billion | +1.0% |
| 1969 | 3.25 billion | +1.2% |
| 1970 | 3.29 billion | +1.1% |
| 1971 | 3.33 billion | +1.2% |
| 1972 | 3.37 billion | +1.4% |
| 1973 | 3.42 billion | +1.4% |
| 1974 | 3.46 billion | +1.2% |
| 1975 | 3.51 billion | +1.5% |
| 1976 | 3.55 billion | +1.0% |
| 1977 | 3.57 billion | +0.8% |
| 1978 | 3.60 billion | +0.6% |
| 1979 | 3.62 billion | +0.5% |
| 1980 | 3.63 billion | +0.5% |
| 1981 | 3.64 billion | +0.3% |
| 1982 | 3.66 billion | +0.3% |
| 1983 | 3.67 billion | +0.3% |
| 1984 | 3.68 billion | +0.3% |
| 1985 | 3.69 billion | +0.3% |
| 1986 | 3.69 billion | +0.1% |
| 1987 | 3.69 billion | +0.2% |
| 1988 | 3.70 billion | +0.3% |
| 1989 | 3.71 billion | +0.1% |
| 1990 | 3.71 billion | +0.0% |
| 1991 | 3.71 billion | -0.1% |
| 1992 | 3.70 billion | -0.0% |
| 1993 | 3.71 billion | +0.2% |
| 1994 | 3.71 billion | +0.1% |
| 1995 | 3.72 billion | +0.1% |
| 1996 | 3.73 billion | +0.2% |
| 1997 | 3.74 billion | +0.4% |
| 1998 | 3.75 billion | +0.3% |
| 1999 | 3.77 billion | +0.4% |
| 2000 | 3.79 billion | +0.6% |
| 2001 | 3.82 billion | +0.7% |
| 2002 | 3.83 billion | +0.5% |
| 2003 | 3.87 billion | +0.8% |
| 2004 | 3.89 billion | +0.7% |
| 2005 | 3.92 billion | +0.7% |
| 2006 | 3.95 billion | +0.6% |
| 2007 | 3.98 billion | +0.8% |
| 2008 | 4.01 billion | +0.9% |
| 2009 | 4.05 billion | +0.9% |
| 2010 | 4.09 billion | +1.0% |
| 2011 | 4.12 billion | +0.9% |
| 2012 | 4.16 billion | +0.9% |
| 2013 | 4.20 billion | +0.9% |
| 2014 | 4.23 billion | +0.9% |
| 2015 | 4.27 billion | +0.8% |
| 2016 | 4.31 billion | +0.8% |
| 2017 | 4.34 billion | +0.8% |
| 2018 | 4.37 billion | +0.7% |
| 2019 | 4.40 billion | +0.6% |
| 2020 | 4.43 billion | +0.8% |
| 2021 | 4.45 billion | +0.5% |
| 2022 | 4.47 billion | +0.4% |
| 2023 | 4.48 billion | +0.3% |
| 2024 | 4.49 billion | +0.2% |
Chile compared with similar countries
- Chile's 4.49 billion is above the median for high income countries, which is 323.46 million, 13.9× the median. (64 countries reporting)
- Chile's 4.49 billion is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 1.63 billion, 2.8× the median. (33 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Cumulative co2 land use in Chile changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1851 | +121.1% | 7.26 million | 16.06 million |
| 1852 | +56.2% | 16.06 million | 25.09 million |
| 1853 | +37.2% | 25.09 million | 34.42 million |
| 1854 | +27.9% | 34.42 million | 44.02 million |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 49.73 million | 7.26 million | 96.09 million | 10 |
| 1860s | 161.11 million | 107.41 million | 216.63 million | 10 |
| 1870s | 296.28 million | 231.26 million | 365.41 million | 10 |
| 1880s | 457.15 million | 380.68 million | 536.93 million | 10 |
| 1890s | 656.48 million | 556.59 million | 753.31 million | 10 |
| 1900s | 894.84 million | 776.92 million | 1.03 billion | 10 |
| 1910s | 1.20 billion | 1.06 billion | 1.36 billion | 10 |
| 1920s | 1.55 billion | 1.40 billion | 1.70 billion | 10 |
| 1930s | 1.93 billion | 1.74 billion | 2.12 billion | 10 |
| 1940s | 2.33 billion | 2.16 billion | 2.51 billion | 10 |
| 1950s | 2.72 billion | 2.55 billion | 2.91 billion | 10 |
| 1960s | 3.10 billion | 2.95 billion | 3.25 billion | 10 |
| 1970s | 3.47 billion | 3.29 billion | 3.62 billion | 10 |
| 1980s | 3.68 billion | 3.63 billion | 3.71 billion | 10 |
| 1990s | 3.73 billion | 3.70 billion | 3.77 billion | 10 |
| 2000s | 3.91 billion | 3.79 billion | 4.05 billion | 10 |
| 2010s | 4.25 billion | 4.09 billion | 4.40 billion | 10 |
| 2020s | 4.47 billion | 4.43 billion | 4.49 billion | 5 |
Countries ranked near Chile
More climate change data for Chile
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 306.17 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 15,030 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 4,258 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 10,772 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 16.07 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 384.71 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 2,205 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 2,015 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 189.84 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 7.61 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cumulative co2 land use in Chile?
- Cumulative co2 land use in Chile was 4.49 billion in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest cumulative co2 land use recorded in Chile?
- The highest recorded value was 4.49 billion in 2024.
- What is the lowest cumulative co2 land use recorded in Chile?
- The lowest recorded value was 7.26 million in 1850.
- How does Chile rank for cumulative co2 land use?
- Chile ranks 36th out of 197 countries with data for 2024.
- Is cumulative co2 land use rising or falling in Chile?
- Over the last ten years it is up 6.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Chile data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Cumulative co2 land use. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 175 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).