Cumulative co2 land use in Guatemala
Guatemala: Cumulative co2 land use was 4.16 billion in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
4.16 billion
Change on year
up 0.7%
World rank
39th
of 197 countries
All-time high
4.16 billion
in 2024
All-time low
9.08 million
in 1850
Years of data
175
1850–2024
Cumulative co2 land use in Guatemala, 1850–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
In 2024, cumulative co2 land use in Guatemala stood at 4.16 billion. That is the highest value across all 175 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 0.7% on the previous year and up 8.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cumulative co2 land use in Guatemala peaked at 4.16 billion in 2024 and was at its lowest, 9.08 million, in 1850.
Guatemala ranks 39th of 197 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Cumulative co2 land use in Guatemala, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1850 | 9.08 million | — |
| 1851 | 19.66 million | +116.4% |
| 1852 | 27.95 million | +42.2% |
| 1853 | 36.89 million | +32.0% |
| 1854 | 45.16 million | +22.4% |
| 1855 | 53.49 million | +18.4% |
| 1856 | 62.11 million | +16.1% |
| 1857 | 70.50 million | +13.5% |
| 1858 | 79.61 million | +12.9% |
| 1859 | 87.96 million | +10.5% |
| 1860 | 95.70 million | +8.8% |
| 1861 | 103.68 million | +8.3% |
| 1862 | 110.57 million | +6.7% |
| 1863 | 117.80 million | +6.5% |
| 1864 | 124.80 million | +5.9% |
| 1865 | 130.64 million | +4.7% |
| 1866 | 139.12 million | +6.5% |
| 1867 | 148.63 million | +6.8% |
| 1868 | 155.36 million | +4.5% |
| 1869 | 163.39 million | +5.2% |
| 1870 | 169.54 million | +3.8% |
| 1871 | 174.81 million | +3.1% |
| 1872 | 179.12 million | +2.5% |
| 1873 | 184.41 million | +3.0% |
| 1874 | 190.62 million | +3.4% |
| 1875 | 195.31 million | +2.5% |
| 1876 | 199.56 million | +2.2% |
| 1877 | 203.43 million | +1.9% |
| 1878 | 208.35 million | +2.4% |
| 1879 | 213.04 million | +2.2% |
| 1880 | 218.17 million | +2.4% |
| 1881 | 221.82 million | +1.7% |
| 1882 | 225.20 million | +1.5% |
| 1883 | 228.96 million | +1.7% |
| 1884 | 231.64 million | +1.2% |
| 1885 | 233.99 million | +1.0% |
| 1886 | 236.48 million | +1.1% |
| 1887 | 239.29 million | +1.2% |
| 1888 | 241.61 million | +1.0% |
| 1889 | 244.07 million | +1.0% |
| 1890 | 246.36 million | +0.9% |
| 1891 | 248.88 million | +1.0% |
| 1892 | 251.13 million | +0.9% |
| 1893 | 253.63 million | +1.0% |
| 1894 | 256.14 million | +1.0% |
| 1895 | 258.51 million | +0.9% |
| 1896 | 260.91 million | +0.9% |
| 1897 | 263.19 million | +0.9% |
| 1898 | 266.11 million | +1.1% |
| 1899 | 268.65 million | +1.0% |
| 1900 | 271.76 million | +1.2% |
| 1901 | 275.42 million | +1.3% |
| 1902 | 280.39 million | +1.8% |
| 1903 | 285.78 million | +1.9% |
| 1904 | 290.28 million | +1.6% |
| 1905 | 296.24 million | +2.1% |
| 1906 | 301.77 million | +1.9% |
| 1907 | 306.51 million | +1.6% |
| 1908 | 312.18 million | +1.8% |
| 1909 | 319.44 million | +2.3% |
| 1910 | 327.39 million | +2.5% |
| 1911 | 334.54 million | +2.2% |
| 1912 | 341.80 million | +2.2% |
| 1913 | 349.18 million | +2.2% |
| 1914 | 357.04 million | +2.3% |
| 1915 | 363.25 million | +1.7% |
| 1916 | 369.89 million | +1.8% |
| 1917 | 375.88 million | +1.6% |
| 1918 | 381.91 million | +1.6% |
| 1919 | 390.06 million | +2.1% |
| 1920 | 399.36 million | +2.4% |
| 1921 | 408.16 million | +2.2% |
| 1922 | 416.19 million | +2.0% |
| 1923 | 424.98 million | +2.1% |
| 1924 | 433.45 million | +2.0% |
| 1925 | 445.42 million | +2.8% |
| 1926 | 455.62 million | +2.3% |
| 1927 | 465.50 million | +2.2% |
| 1928 | 474.55 million | +1.9% |
| 1929 | 483.37 million | +1.9% |
| 1930 | 496.86 million | +2.8% |
| 1931 | 516.45 million | +3.9% |
| 1932 | 535.13 million | +3.6% |
| 1933 | 554.96 million | +3.7% |
| 1934 | 577.84 million | +4.1% |
| 1935 | 600.33 million | +3.9% |
| 1936 | 624.77 million | +4.1% |
| 1937 | 649.91 million | +4.0% |
| 1938 | 673.54 million | +3.6% |
| 1939 | 699.48 million | +3.9% |
| 1940 | 732.93 million | +4.8% |
| 1941 | 774.02 million | +5.6% |
| 1942 | 818.04 million | +5.7% |
| 1943 | 866.91 million | +6.0% |
| 1944 | 915.94 million | +5.7% |
| 1945 | 963.50 million | +5.2% |
| 1946 | 1.02 billion | +5.4% |
| 1947 | 1.07 billion | +5.1% |
| 1948 | 1.12 billion | +4.7% |
| 1949 | 1.18 billion | +5.6% |
| 1950 | 1.24 billion | +5.3% |
| 1951 | 1.30 billion | +4.9% |
| 1952 | 1.36 billion | +4.5% |
| 1953 | 1.42 billion | +4.2% |
| 1954 | 1.47 billion | +3.7% |
| 1955 | 1.52 billion | +3.5% |
| 1956 | 1.58 billion | +3.7% |
| 1957 | 1.63 billion | +3.4% |
| 1958 | 1.69 billion | +3.3% |
| 1959 | 1.74 billion | +3.4% |
| 1960 | 1.79 billion | +2.6% |
| 1961 | 1.82 billion | +1.8% |
| 1962 | 1.85 billion | +1.5% |
| 1963 | 1.87 billion | +1.3% |
| 1964 | 1.89 billion | +1.1% |
| 1965 | 1.91 billion | +1.1% |
| 1966 | 1.93 billion | +1.1% |
| 1967 | 1.95 billion | +1.1% |
| 1968 | 1.97 billion | +0.9% |
| 1969 | 1.99 billion | +0.9% |
| 1970 | 2.01 billion | +0.9% |
| 1971 | 2.03 billion | +1.0% |
| 1972 | 2.05 billion | +1.2% |
| 1973 | 2.08 billion | +1.4% |
| 1974 | 2.11 billion | +1.2% |
| 1975 | 2.13 billion | +1.3% |
| 1976 | 2.17 billion | +1.6% |
| 1977 | 2.20 billion | +1.6% |
| 1978 | 2.23 billion | +1.3% |
| 1979 | 2.26 billion | +1.2% |
| 1980 | 2.28 billion | +1.0% |
| 1981 | 2.31 billion | +1.1% |
| 1982 | 2.33 billion | +1.2% |
| 1983 | 2.44 billion | +4.6% |
| 1984 | 2.49 billion | +2.2% |
| 1985 | 2.53 billion | +1.6% |
| 1986 | 2.56 billion | +1.3% |
| 1987 | 2.66 billion | +3.8% |
| 1988 | 2.71 billion | +2.0% |
| 1989 | 2.75 billion | +1.5% |
| 1990 | 2.79 billion | +1.2% |
| 1991 | 2.82 billion | +1.2% |
| 1992 | 2.88 billion | +2.2% |
| 1993 | 2.93 billion | +1.8% |
| 1994 | 2.99 billion | +1.8% |
| 1995 | 3.03 billion | +1.3% |
| 1996 | 3.08 billion | +1.8% |
| 1997 | 3.16 billion | +2.5% |
| 1998 | 3.22 billion | +2.1% |
| 1999 | 3.29 billion | +2.1% |
| 2000 | 3.36 billion | +2.0% |
| 2001 | 3.42 billion | +1.8% |
| 2002 | 3.49 billion | +2.0% |
| 2003 | 3.53 billion | +1.2% |
| 2004 | 3.55 billion | +0.7% |
| 2005 | 3.58 billion | +0.8% |
| 2006 | 3.63 billion | +1.3% |
| 2007 | 3.67 billion | +1.0% |
| 2008 | 3.69 billion | +0.8% |
| 2009 | 3.72 billion | +0.7% |
| 2010 | 3.74 billion | +0.6% |
| 2011 | 3.76 billion | +0.5% |
| 2012 | 3.78 billion | +0.5% |
| 2013 | 3.81 billion | +0.7% |
| 2014 | 3.85 billion | +1.2% |
| 2015 | 3.89 billion | +0.9% |
| 2016 | 3.92 billion | +0.8% |
| 2017 | 3.95 billion | +0.8% |
| 2018 | 3.98 billion | +0.8% |
| 2019 | 4.02 billion | +0.8% |
| 2020 | 4.05 billion | +0.7% |
| 2021 | 4.07 billion | +0.7% |
| 2022 | 4.10 billion | +0.7% |
| 2023 | 4.13 billion | +0.7% |
| 2024 | 4.16 billion | +0.7% |
Guatemala compared with similar countries
- Guatemala's 4.16 billion is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 629.27 million, 6.6× the median. (58 countries reporting)
- Guatemala's 4.16 billion is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 1.63 billion, 2.6× the median. (33 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Cumulative co2 land use in Guatemala changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1851 | +116.4% | 9.08 million | 19.66 million |
| 1852 | +42.2% | 19.66 million | 27.95 million |
| 1853 | +32.0% | 27.95 million | 36.89 million |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 49.24 million | 9.08 million | 87.96 million | 10 |
| 1860s | 128.97 million | 95.70 million | 163.39 million | 10 |
| 1870s | 191.82 million | 169.54 million | 213.04 million | 10 |
| 1880s | 232.12 million | 218.17 million | 244.07 million | 10 |
| 1890s | 257.35 million | 246.36 million | 268.65 million | 10 |
| 1900s | 293.98 million | 271.76 million | 319.44 million | 10 |
| 1910s | 359.09 million | 327.39 million | 390.06 million | 10 |
| 1920s | 440.66 million | 399.36 million | 483.37 million | 10 |
| 1930s | 592.93 million | 496.86 million | 699.48 million | 10 |
| 1940s | 944.85 million | 732.93 million | 1.18 billion | 10 |
| 1950s | 1.50 billion | 1.24 billion | 1.74 billion | 10 |
| 1960s | 1.90 billion | 1.79 billion | 1.99 billion | 10 |
| 1970s | 2.13 billion | 2.01 billion | 2.26 billion | 10 |
| 1980s | 2.51 billion | 2.28 billion | 2.75 billion | 10 |
| 1990s | 3.02 billion | 2.79 billion | 3.29 billion | 10 |
| 2000s | 3.56 billion | 3.36 billion | 3.72 billion | 10 |
| 2010s | 3.87 billion | 3.74 billion | 4.02 billion | 10 |
| 2020s | 4.10 billion | 4.05 billion | 4.16 billion | 5 |
Countries ranked near Guatemala
More climate change data for Guatemala
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 248.53 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 11,983 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 3,365 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 8,617 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 12.7 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 307.77 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 1,636 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 1,566 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 69.61 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 5.91 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cumulative co2 land use in Guatemala?
- Cumulative co2 land use in Guatemala was 4.16 billion in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest cumulative co2 land use recorded in Guatemala?
- The highest recorded value was 4.16 billion in 2024.
- What is the lowest cumulative co2 land use recorded in Guatemala?
- The lowest recorded value was 9.08 million in 1850.
- How does Guatemala rank for cumulative co2 land use?
- Guatemala ranks 39th out of 197 countries with data for 2024.
- Is cumulative co2 land use rising or falling in Guatemala?
- Over the last ten years it is up 8.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Guatemala data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Cumulative co2 land use. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 175 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).