Cumulative co2 land use in Cuba
Cuba: Cumulative co2 land use was 4.00 billion in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
4.00 billion
Change on year
down 0.0%
World rank
41st
of 197 countries
All-time high
4.09 billion
in 2005
All-time low
4.84 million
in 1850
Years of data
175
1850–2024
Cumulative co2 land use in Cuba, 1850–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
In 2024, cumulative co2 land use in Cuba stood at 4.00 billion.
The figure is down 0.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cumulative co2 land use in Cuba peaked at 4.09 billion in 2005 and was at its lowest, 4.84 million, in 1850.
Cuba ranks 41st of 197 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Cumulative co2 land use in Cuba, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1850 | 4.84 million | — |
| 1851 | 8.95 million | +84.9% |
| 1852 | 12.67 million | +41.6% |
| 1853 | 16.15 million | +27.5% |
| 1854 | 19.46 million | +20.5% |
| 1855 | 22.65 million | +16.4% |
| 1856 | 25.73 million | +13.6% |
| 1857 | 28.74 million | +11.7% |
| 1858 | 31.69 million | +10.3% |
| 1859 | 34.58 million | +9.1% |
| 1860 | 37.41 million | +8.2% |
| 1861 | 40.18 million | +7.4% |
| 1862 | 42.92 million | +6.8% |
| 1863 | 45.63 million | +6.3% |
| 1864 | 48.32 million | +5.9% |
| 1865 | 50.98 million | +5.5% |
| 1866 | 53.64 million | +5.2% |
| 1867 | 56.26 million | +4.9% |
| 1868 | 58.87 million | +4.6% |
| 1869 | 61.48 million | +4.4% |
| 1870 | 64.30 million | +4.6% |
| 1871 | 67.21 million | +4.5% |
| 1872 | 70.16 million | +4.4% |
| 1873 | 73.14 million | +4.2% |
| 1874 | 76.14 million | +4.1% |
| 1875 | 79.16 million | +4.0% |
| 1876 | 82.18 million | +3.8% |
| 1877 | 85.22 million | +3.7% |
| 1878 | 88.27 million | +3.6% |
| 1879 | 91.32 million | +3.5% |
| 1880 | 94.47 million | +3.4% |
| 1881 | 97.66 million | +3.4% |
| 1882 | 100.87 million | +3.3% |
| 1883 | 104.09 million | +3.2% |
| 1884 | 107.34 million | +3.1% |
| 1885 | 110.60 million | +3.0% |
| 1886 | 113.86 million | +3.0% |
| 1887 | 117.14 million | +2.9% |
| 1888 | 120.43 million | +2.8% |
| 1889 | 123.73 million | +2.7% |
| 1890 | 127.11 million | +2.7% |
| 1891 | 130.52 million | +2.7% |
| 1892 | 133.95 million | +2.6% |
| 1893 | 137.39 million | +2.6% |
| 1894 | 140.85 million | +2.5% |
| 1895 | 144.33 million | +2.5% |
| 1896 | 147.82 million | +2.4% |
| 1897 | 151.32 million | +2.4% |
| 1898 | 154.82 million | +2.3% |
| 1899 | 158.35 million | +2.3% |
| 1900 | 166.99 million | +5.5% |
| 1901 | 177.62 million | +6.4% |
| 1902 | 189.36 million | +6.6% |
| 1903 | 201.83 million | +6.6% |
| 1904 | 214.83 million | +6.4% |
| 1905 | 228.23 million | +6.2% |
| 1906 | 241.97 million | +6.0% |
| 1907 | 255.97 million | +5.8% |
| 1908 | 270.22 million | +5.6% |
| 1909 | 284.68 million | +5.4% |
| 1910 | 303.06 million | +6.5% |
| 1911 | 323.04 million | +6.6% |
| 1912 | 343.98 million | +6.5% |
| 1913 | 365.56 million | +6.3% |
| 1914 | 387.65 million | +6.0% |
| 1915 | 410.15 million | +5.8% |
| 1916 | 432.97 million | +5.6% |
| 1917 | 456.09 million | +5.3% |
| 1918 | 479.47 million | +5.1% |
| 1919 | 503.07 million | +4.9% |
| 1920 | 527.98 million | +5.0% |
| 1921 | 553.49 million | +4.8% |
| 1922 | 579.36 million | +4.7% |
| 1923 | 605.50 million | +4.5% |
| 1924 | 631.83 million | +4.3% |
| 1925 | 658.32 million | +4.2% |
| 1926 | 684.95 million | +4.0% |
| 1927 | 711.68 million | +3.9% |
| 1928 | 738.51 million | +3.8% |
| 1929 | 765.43 million | +3.6% |
| 1930 | 785.96 million | +2.7% |
| 1931 | 804.04 million | +2.3% |
| 1932 | 820.81 million | +2.1% |
| 1933 | 836.75 million | +1.9% |
| 1934 | 852.09 million | +1.8% |
| 1935 | 866.99 million | +1.7% |
| 1936 | 881.55 million | +1.7% |
| 1937 | 895.84 million | +1.6% |
| 1938 | 909.89 million | +1.6% |
| 1939 | 923.75 million | +1.5% |
| 1940 | 952.64 million | +3.1% |
| 1941 | 987.27 million | +3.6% |
| 1942 | 1.02 billion | +3.8% |
| 1943 | 1.06 billion | +3.9% |
| 1944 | 1.11 billion | +3.9% |
| 1945 | 1.15 billion | +3.8% |
| 1946 | 1.19 billion | +3.7% |
| 1947 | 1.23 billion | +3.6% |
| 1948 | 1.28 billion | +3.6% |
| 1949 | 1.32 billion | +3.5% |
| 1950 | 1.39 billion | +5.3% |
| 1951 | 1.46 billion | +4.8% |
| 1952 | 1.60 billion | +9.5% |
| 1953 | 1.66 billion | +4.2% |
| 1954 | 1.72 billion | +3.3% |
| 1955 | 1.75 billion | +2.1% |
| 1956 | 1.78 billion | +1.5% |
| 1957 | 1.80 billion | +1.2% |
| 1958 | 1.82 billion | +1.2% |
| 1959 | 1.84 billion | +0.9% |
| 1960 | 1.85 billion | +0.6% |
| 1961 | 1.92 billion | +3.5% |
| 1962 | 2.00 billion | +4.4% |
| 1963 | 2.20 billion | +10.0% |
| 1964 | 2.28 billion | +3.7% |
| 1965 | 2.33 billion | +1.9% |
| 1966 | 2.39 billion | +2.8% |
| 1967 | 2.47 billion | +3.3% |
| 1968 | 2.53 billion | +2.4% |
| 1969 | 2.64 billion | +4.4% |
| 1970 | 2.71 billion | +2.5% |
| 1971 | 2.87 billion | +6.1% |
| 1972 | 3.02 billion | +4.9% |
| 1973 | 3.08 billion | +2.2% |
| 1974 | 3.17 billion | +2.7% |
| 1975 | 3.26 billion | +2.9% |
| 1976 | 3.31 billion | +1.7% |
| 1977 | 3.35 billion | +1.0% |
| 1978 | 3.37 billion | +0.7% |
| 1979 | 3.40 billion | +0.9% |
| 1980 | 3.42 billion | +0.6% |
| 1981 | 3.46 billion | +1.3% |
| 1982 | 3.50 billion | +1.2% |
| 1983 | 3.53 billion | +0.8% |
| 1984 | 3.56 billion | +1.0% |
| 1985 | 3.63 billion | +1.9% |
| 1986 | 3.72 billion | +2.4% |
| 1987 | 3.78 billion | +1.6% |
| 1988 | 3.81 billion | +0.9% |
| 1989 | 3.83 billion | +0.7% |
| 1990 | 3.86 billion | +0.6% |
| 1991 | 3.89 billion | +1.0% |
| 1992 | 3.92 billion | +0.6% |
| 1993 | 3.93 billion | +0.4% |
| 1994 | 3.95 billion | +0.4% |
| 1995 | 3.96 billion | +0.1% |
| 1996 | 3.99 billion | +0.8% |
| 1997 | 4.00 billion | +0.3% |
| 1998 | 4.02 billion | +0.4% |
| 1999 | 4.02 billion | +0.1% |
| 2000 | 4.06 billion | +0.9% |
| 2001 | 4.07 billion | +0.4% |
| 2002 | 4.08 billion | +0.1% |
| 2003 | 4.08 billion | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 4.09 billion | +0.3% |
| 2005 | 4.09 billion | +0.1% |
| 2006 | 4.09 billion | -0.0% |
| 2007 | 4.09 billion | -0.1% |
| 2008 | 4.08 billion | -0.2% |
| 2009 | 4.07 billion | -0.2% |
| 2010 | 4.06 billion | -0.2% |
| 2011 | 4.04 billion | -0.5% |
| 2012 | 4.03 billion | -0.2% |
| 2013 | 4.02 billion | -0.3% |
| 2014 | 4.01 billion | -0.2% |
| 2015 | 4.00 billion | -0.3% |
| 2016 | 4.01 billion | +0.2% |
| 2017 | 4.01 billion | -0.0% |
| 2018 | 4.02 billion | +0.2% |
| 2019 | 4.01 billion | -0.0% |
| 2020 | 4.01 billion | -0.1% |
| 2021 | 4.01 billion | -0.1% |
| 2022 | 4.01 billion | -0.0% |
| 2023 | 4.00 billion | -0.0% |
| 2024 | 4.00 billion | -0.0% |
Cuba compared with similar countries
- Cuba's 4.00 billion is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 629.27 million, 6.4× the median. (58 countries reporting)
- Cuba's 4.00 billion is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 1.63 billion, 2.5× the median. (33 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Cumulative co2 land use in Cuba changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1851 | +84.9% | 4.84 million | 8.95 million |
| 1852 | +41.6% | 8.95 million | 12.67 million |
| 1853 | +27.5% | 12.67 million | 16.15 million |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 20.55 million | 4.84 million | 34.58 million | 10 |
| 1860s | 49.57 million | 37.41 million | 61.48 million | 10 |
| 1870s | 77.71 million | 64.30 million | 91.32 million | 10 |
| 1880s | 109.02 million | 94.47 million | 123.73 million | 10 |
| 1890s | 142.65 million | 127.11 million | 158.35 million | 10 |
| 1900s | 223.17 million | 166.99 million | 284.68 million | 10 |
| 1910s | 400.50 million | 303.06 million | 503.07 million | 10 |
| 1920s | 645.71 million | 527.98 million | 765.43 million | 10 |
| 1930s | 857.77 million | 785.96 million | 923.75 million | 10 |
| 1940s | 1.13 billion | 952.64 million | 1.32 billion | 10 |
| 1950s | 1.68 billion | 1.39 billion | 1.84 billion | 10 |
| 1960s | 2.26 billion | 1.85 billion | 2.64 billion | 10 |
| 1970s | 3.15 billion | 2.71 billion | 3.40 billion | 10 |
| 1980s | 3.62 billion | 3.42 billion | 3.83 billion | 10 |
| 1990s | 3.95 billion | 3.86 billion | 4.02 billion | 10 |
| 2000s | 4.08 billion | 4.06 billion | 4.09 billion | 10 |
| 2010s | 4.02 billion | 4.00 billion | 4.06 billion | 10 |
| 2020s | 4.01 billion | 4.00 billion | 4.01 billion | 5 |
Countries ranked near Cuba
More climate change data for Cuba
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 70.05 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 12,131 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 3,149 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 8,982 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 11.88 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 320.8 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 2,054 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 500.27 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 1,554 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 1.89 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cumulative co2 land use in Cuba?
- Cumulative co2 land use in Cuba was 4.00 billion in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest cumulative co2 land use recorded in Cuba?
- The highest recorded value was 4.09 billion in 2005.
- What is the lowest cumulative co2 land use recorded in Cuba?
- The lowest recorded value was 4.84 million in 1850.
- How does Cuba rank for cumulative co2 land use?
- Cuba ranks 41st out of 197 countries with data for 2024.
- Is cumulative co2 land use rising or falling in Cuba?
- Over the last ten years it is down 0.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Cuba data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Cumulative co2 land use. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 175 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).