Cumulative co2 land use in Mozambique
Mozambique: Cumulative co2 land use was 4.41 billion in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
4.41 billion
Change on year
up 0.7%
World rank
37th
of 197 countries
All-time high
4.41 billion
in 2024
All-time low
-115.21 million
in 1919
Years of data
175
1850–2024
Cumulative co2 land use in Mozambique, 1850–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
In 2024, cumulative co2 land use in Mozambique stood at 4.41 billion. That is the highest value across all 175 years on record.
That represents a change of up 0.7% on the previous year and up 9.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cumulative co2 land use in Mozambique peaked at 4.41 billion in 2024 and was at its lowest, -115.21 million, in 1919.
That places Mozambique 37th out of 197 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Cumulative co2 land use in Mozambique, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1850 | 12.12 million | — |
| 1851 | 20.60 million | +70.0% |
| 1852 | 27.22 million | +32.1% |
| 1853 | 32.64 million | +19.9% |
| 1854 | 37.23 million | +14.1% |
| 1855 | 41.16 million | +10.5% |
| 1856 | 44.56 million | +8.3% |
| 1857 | 47.63 million | +6.9% |
| 1858 | 50.28 million | +5.6% |
| 1859 | 52.67 million | +4.8% |
| 1860 | 54.58 million | +3.6% |
| 1861 | 56.12 million | +2.8% |
| 1862 | 57.35 million | +2.2% |
| 1863 | 58.36 million | +1.7% |
| 1864 | 59.10 million | +1.3% |
| 1865 | 59.63 million | +0.9% |
| 1866 | 59.98 million | +0.6% |
| 1867 | 60.53 million | +0.9% |
| 1868 | 60.69 million | +0.3% |
| 1869 | 60.63 million | -0.1% |
| 1870 | 60.26 million | -0.6% |
| 1871 | 59.61 million | -1.1% |
| 1872 | 58.74 million | -1.5% |
| 1873 | 57.66 million | -1.8% |
| 1874 | 56.40 million | -2.2% |
| 1875 | 54.98 million | -2.5% |
| 1876 | 53.41 million | -2.9% |
| 1877 | 51.74 million | -3.1% |
| 1878 | 49.92 million | -3.5% |
| 1879 | 47.97 million | -3.9% |
| 1880 | 46.60 million | -2.9% |
| 1881 | 45.63 million | -2.1% |
| 1882 | 45.03 million | -1.3% |
| 1883 | 44.68 million | -0.8% |
| 1884 | 44.55 million | -0.3% |
| 1885 | 44.62 million | +0.1% |
| 1886 | 44.86 million | +0.5% |
| 1887 | 45.25 million | +0.9% |
| 1888 | 45.78 million | +1.2% |
| 1889 | 46.43 million | +1.4% |
| 1890 | 46.28 million | -0.3% |
| 1891 | 45.51 million | -1.7% |
| 1892 | 44.26 million | -2.8% |
| 1893 | 42.58 million | -3.8% |
| 1894 | 40.51 million | -4.9% |
| 1895 | 38.09 million | -6.0% |
| 1896 | 35.35 million | -7.2% |
| 1897 | 32.31 million | -8.6% |
| 1898 | 29.01 million | -10.2% |
| 1899 | 25.46 million | -12.2% |
| 1900 | 21.34 million | -16.2% |
| 1901 | 16.66 million | -21.9% |
| 1902 | 11.45 million | -31.3% |
| 1903 | 5.72 million | -50.0% |
| 1904 | -487,606 | -108.5% |
| 1905 | -7.14 million | +1364.9% |
| 1906 | -14.22 million | +99.1% |
| 1907 | -21.70 million | +52.6% |
| 1908 | -29.55 million | +36.2% |
| 1909 | -37.76 million | +27.8% |
| 1910 | -45.90 million | +21.6% |
| 1911 | -53.94 million | +17.5% |
| 1912 | -61.88 million | +14.7% |
| 1913 | -69.71 million | +12.7% |
| 1914 | -77.44 million | +11.1% |
| 1915 | -85.10 million | +9.9% |
| 1916 | -92.69 million | +8.9% |
| 1917 | -100.24 million | +8.1% |
| 1918 | -107.74 million | +7.5% |
| 1919 | -115.21 million | +6.9% |
| 1920 | -114.35 million | -0.7% |
| 1921 | -108.13 million | -5.4% |
| 1922 | -98.07 million | -9.3% |
| 1923 | -85.07 million | -13.3% |
| 1924 | -69.72 million | -18.0% |
| 1925 | -52.40 million | -24.8% |
| 1926 | -33.40 million | -36.3% |
| 1927 | -12.93 million | -61.3% |
| 1928 | 8.82 million | -168.2% |
| 1929 | 31.80 million | +260.5% |
| 1930 | 56.90 million | +78.9% |
| 1931 | 83.45 million | +46.6% |
| 1932 | 111.00 million | +33.0% |
| 1933 | 140.05 million | +26.2% |
| 1934 | 169.51 million | +21.0% |
| 1935 | 199.84 million | +17.9% |
| 1936 | 230.94 million | +15.6% |
| 1937 | 262.91 million | +13.8% |
| 1938 | 295.30 million | +12.3% |
| 1939 | 327.67 million | +11.0% |
| 1940 | 363.72 million | +11.0% |
| 1941 | 401.20 million | +10.3% |
| 1942 | 441.18 million | +10.0% |
| 1943 | 481.77 million | +9.2% |
| 1944 | 525.96 million | +9.2% |
| 1945 | 571.81 million | +8.7% |
| 1946 | 618.45 million | +8.2% |
| 1947 | 665.76 million | +7.7% |
| 1948 | 714.06 million | +7.3% |
| 1949 | 763.74 million | +7.0% |
| 1950 | 875.56 million | +14.6% |
| 1951 | 961.31 million | +9.8% |
| 1952 | 1.04 billion | +8.3% |
| 1953 | 1.12 billion | +7.4% |
| 1954 | 1.19 billion | +6.8% |
| 1955 | 1.27 billion | +6.2% |
| 1956 | 1.34 billion | +6.1% |
| 1957 | 1.42 billion | +5.9% |
| 1958 | 1.50 billion | +5.6% |
| 1959 | 1.58 billion | +5.4% |
| 1960 | 1.67 billion | +5.4% |
| 1961 | 1.74 billion | +4.0% |
| 1962 | 1.79 billion | +3.0% |
| 1963 | 1.83 billion | +2.4% |
| 1964 | 1.87 billion | +2.1% |
| 1965 | 1.90 billion | +1.8% |
| 1966 | 1.94 billion | +1.7% |
| 1967 | 1.98 billion | +2.0% |
| 1968 | 2.02 billion | +2.4% |
| 1969 | 2.08 billion | +2.7% |
| 1970 | 2.12 billion | +2.1% |
| 1971 | 2.16 billion | +1.7% |
| 1972 | 2.19 billion | +1.6% |
| 1973 | 2.22 billion | +1.4% |
| 1974 | 2.25 billion | +1.2% |
| 1975 | 2.27 billion | +1.0% |
| 1976 | 2.29 billion | +0.9% |
| 1977 | 2.31 billion | +0.9% |
| 1978 | 2.33 billion | +0.9% |
| 1979 | 2.35 billion | +0.8% |
| 1980 | 2.37 billion | +1.0% |
| 1981 | 2.40 billion | +1.2% |
| 1982 | 2.43 billion | +1.0% |
| 1983 | 2.45 billion | +1.2% |
| 1984 | 2.48 billion | +1.2% |
| 1985 | 2.51 billion | +1.2% |
| 1986 | 2.55 billion | +1.3% |
| 1987 | 2.58 billion | +1.2% |
| 1988 | 2.60 billion | +1.0% |
| 1989 | 2.63 billion | +0.9% |
| 1990 | 2.66 billion | +1.1% |
| 1991 | 2.69 billion | +1.1% |
| 1992 | 2.71 billion | +1.1% |
| 1993 | 2.74 billion | +1.1% |
| 1994 | 2.79 billion | +1.5% |
| 1995 | 2.83 billion | +1.6% |
| 1996 | 2.88 billion | +1.9% |
| 1997 | 2.94 billion | +1.9% |
| 1998 | 2.99 billion | +1.8% |
| 1999 | 3.04 billion | +1.8% |
| 2000 | 3.11 billion | +2.0% |
| 2001 | 3.19 billion | +2.7% |
| 2002 | 3.27 billion | +2.4% |
| 2003 | 3.34 billion | +2.3% |
| 2004 | 3.43 billion | +2.7% |
| 2005 | 3.50 billion | +2.1% |
| 2006 | 3.58 billion | +2.3% |
| 2007 | 3.67 billion | +2.3% |
| 2008 | 3.74 billion | +2.1% |
| 2009 | 3.82 billion | +1.9% |
| 2010 | 3.87 billion | +1.5% |
| 2011 | 3.92 billion | +1.2% |
| 2012 | 3.96 billion | +1.0% |
| 2013 | 4.00 billion | +1.0% |
| 2014 | 4.03 billion | +0.9% |
| 2015 | 4.08 billion | +1.1% |
| 2016 | 4.12 billion | +1.2% |
| 2017 | 4.18 billion | +1.2% |
| 2018 | 4.21 billion | +0.9% |
| 2019 | 4.25 billion | +0.9% |
| 2020 | 4.28 billion | +0.8% |
| 2021 | 4.31 billion | +0.8% |
| 2022 | 4.35 billion | +0.8% |
| 2023 | 4.38 billion | +0.7% |
| 2024 | 4.41 billion | +0.7% |
Mozambique compared with similar countries
- Mozambique's 4.41 billion is above the median for low income countries, which is 1.53 billion, 2.9× the median. (25 countries reporting)
- Mozambique's 4.41 billion is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 1.56 billion, 2.8× the median. (48 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Cumulative co2 land use in Mozambique changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1905 | -1364.9% | -487,606 | -7.14 million |
| 1929 | +260.5% | 8.82 million | 31.80 million |
| 1928 | +168.2% | -12.93 million | 8.82 million |
| 1904 | -108.5% | 5.72 million | -487,606 |
| 1906 | -99.1% | -7.14 million | -14.22 million |
| 1930 | +78.9% | 31.80 million | 56.90 million |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 36.61 million | 12.12 million | 52.67 million | 10 |
| 1860s | 58.70 million | 54.58 million | 60.69 million | 10 |
| 1870s | 55.07 million | 47.97 million | 60.26 million | 10 |
| 1880s | 45.34 million | 44.55 million | 46.60 million | 10 |
| 1890s | 37.94 million | 25.46 million | 46.28 million | 10 |
| 1900s | -5.57 million | -37.76 million | 21.34 million | 10 |
| 1910s | -80.98 million | -115.21 million | -45.90 million | 10 |
| 1920s | -53.34 million | -114.35 million | 31.80 million | 10 |
| 1930s | 187.76 million | 56.90 million | 327.67 million | 10 |
| 1940s | 554.76 million | 363.72 million | 763.74 million | 10 |
| 1950s | 1.23 billion | 875.56 million | 1.58 billion | 10 |
| 1960s | 1.88 billion | 1.67 billion | 2.08 billion | 10 |
| 1970s | 2.25 billion | 2.12 billion | 2.35 billion | 10 |
| 1980s | 2.50 billion | 2.37 billion | 2.63 billion | 10 |
| 1990s | 2.83 billion | 2.66 billion | 3.04 billion | 10 |
| 2000s | 3.47 billion | 3.11 billion | 3.82 billion | 10 |
| 2010s | 4.06 billion | 3.87 billion | 4.25 billion | 10 |
| 2020s | 4.35 billion | 4.28 billion | 4.41 billion | 5 |
Countries ranked near Mozambique
More climate change data for Mozambique
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 81.74 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 12,495 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 6,629 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 5,867 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 25.01 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 209.52 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 2,596 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 923.79 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 1,672 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 3.49 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cumulative co2 land use in Mozambique?
- Cumulative co2 land use in Mozambique was 4.41 billion in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest cumulative co2 land use recorded in Mozambique?
- The highest recorded value was 4.41 billion in 2024.
- What is the lowest cumulative co2 land use recorded in Mozambique?
- The lowest recorded value was -115.21 million in 1919.
- How does Mozambique rank for cumulative co2 land use?
- Mozambique ranks 37th out of 197 countries with data for 2024.
- Is cumulative co2 land use rising or falling in Mozambique?
- Over the last ten years it is up 9.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Mozambique data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Cumulative co2 land use. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 175 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).