Cumulative co2 land use in Cambodia
Cambodia: Cumulative co2 land use was 5.11 billion in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Cumulative co2 land use in Cambodia, 1850–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
In 2024, cumulative co2 land use in Cambodia stood at 5.11 billion. That is the highest value across all 175 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 0.9% on the previous year and up 9.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cumulative co2 land use in Cambodia peaked at 5.11 billion in 2024 and was at its lowest, 1.15 million, in 1850.
That places Cambodia 34th out of 197 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Cumulative co2 land use in Cambodia, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1850 | 1.15 million | — |
| 1851 | 2.22 million | +92.8% |
| 1852 | 3.22 million | +45.3% |
| 1853 | 4.24 million | +31.6% |
| 1854 | 5.23 million | +23.1% |
| 1855 | 6.18 million | +18.2% |
| 1856 | 7.15 million | +15.7% |
| 1857 | 8.11 million | +13.5% |
| 1858 | 9.08 million | +11.9% |
| 1859 | 10.09 million | +11.1% |
| 1860 | 11.10 million | +10.0% |
| 1861 | 12.13 million | +9.3% |
| 1862 | 13.18 million | +8.6% |
| 1863 | 14.25 million | +8.1% |
| 1864 | 15.45 million | +8.4% |
| 1865 | 16.59 million | +7.4% |
| 1866 | 17.71 million | +6.8% |
| 1867 | 18.87 million | +6.5% |
| 1868 | 20.04 million | +6.2% |
| 1869 | 21.26 million | +6.1% |
| 1870 | 23.42 million | +10.2% |
| 1871 | 26.08 million | +11.4% |
| 1872 | 28.97 million | +11.0% |
| 1873 | 32.24 million | +11.3% |
| 1874 | 35.38 million | +9.7% |
| 1875 | 38.71 million | +9.4% |
| 1876 | 42.04 million | +8.6% |
| 1877 | 45.68 million | +8.6% |
| 1878 | 49.10 million | +7.5% |
| 1879 | 52.77 million | +7.5% |
| 1880 | 57.45 million | +8.9% |
| 1881 | 62.60 million | +9.0% |
| 1882 | 67.96 million | +8.6% |
| 1883 | 74.12 million | +9.1% |
| 1884 | 80.20 million | +8.2% |
| 1885 | 86.03 million | +7.3% |
| 1886 | 91.99 million | +6.9% |
| 1887 | 98.16 million | +6.7% |
| 1888 | 104.05 million | +6.0% |
| 1889 | 110.49 million | +6.2% |
| 1890 | 116.96 million | +5.9% |
| 1891 | 123.89 million | +5.9% |
| 1892 | 130.88 million | +5.6% |
| 1893 | 137.68 million | +5.2% |
| 1894 | 144.98 million | +5.3% |
| 1895 | 152.07 million | +4.9% |
| 1896 | 158.72 million | +4.4% |
| 1897 | 165.97 million | +4.6% |
| 1898 | 173.69 million | +4.7% |
| 1899 | 180.63 million | +4.0% |
| 1900 | 187.57 million | +3.8% |
| 1901 | 195.40 million | +4.2% |
| 1902 | 203.22 million | +4.0% |
| 1903 | 210.68 million | +3.7% |
| 1904 | 218.61 million | +3.8% |
| 1905 | 226.83 million | +3.8% |
| 1906 | 235.15 million | +3.7% |
| 1907 | 243.43 million | +3.5% |
| 1908 | 251.29 million | +3.2% |
| 1909 | 259.35 million | +3.2% |
| 1910 | 267.84 million | +3.3% |
| 1911 | 276.55 million | +3.3% |
| 1912 | 285.79 million | +3.3% |
| 1913 | 294.99 million | +3.2% |
| 1914 | 304.28 million | +3.1% |
| 1915 | 314.23 million | +3.3% |
| 1916 | 323.63 million | +3.0% |
| 1917 | 332.79 million | +2.8% |
| 1918 | 342.31 million | +2.9% |
| 1919 | 351.59 million | +2.7% |
| 1920 | 368.71 million | +4.9% |
| 1921 | 389.92 million | +5.8% |
| 1922 | 413.57 million | +6.1% |
| 1923 | 439.18 million | +6.2% |
| 1924 | 465.95 million | +6.1% |
| 1925 | 493.33 million | +5.9% |
| 1926 | 521.29 million | +5.7% |
| 1927 | 550.49 million | +5.6% |
| 1928 | 580.16 million | +5.4% |
| 1929 | 609.68 million | +5.1% |
| 1930 | 642.59 million | +5.4% |
| 1931 | 677.76 million | +5.5% |
| 1932 | 711.40 million | +5.0% |
| 1933 | 747.47 million | +5.1% |
| 1934 | 784.47 million | +4.9% |
| 1935 | 821.99 million | +4.8% |
| 1936 | 858.48 million | +4.4% |
| 1937 | 895.96 million | +4.4% |
| 1938 | 935.30 million | +4.4% |
| 1939 | 974.45 million | +4.2% |
| 1940 | 1.01 billion | +4.1% |
| 1941 | 1.06 billion | +4.1% |
| 1942 | 1.10 billion | +4.2% |
| 1943 | 1.14 billion | +3.9% |
| 1944 | 1.19 billion | +3.8% |
| 1945 | 1.23 billion | +3.7% |
| 1946 | 1.28 billion | +3.8% |
| 1947 | 1.32 billion | +3.6% |
| 1948 | 1.37 billion | +3.4% |
| 1949 | 1.43 billion | +4.3% |
| 1950 | 1.50 billion | +5.1% |
| 1951 | 1.58 billion | +5.4% |
| 1952 | 1.67 billion | +5.6% |
| 1953 | 1.76 billion | +5.4% |
| 1954 | 1.85 billion | +5.1% |
| 1955 | 1.94 billion | +4.8% |
| 1956 | 2.03 billion | +4.7% |
| 1957 | 2.13 billion | +4.6% |
| 1958 | 2.22 billion | +4.5% |
| 1959 | 2.34 billion | +5.0% |
| 1960 | 2.41 billion | +3.1% |
| 1961 | 2.47 billion | +2.4% |
| 1962 | 2.52 billion | +2.0% |
| 1963 | 2.57 billion | +2.2% |
| 1964 | 2.62 billion | +2.0% |
| 1965 | 2.67 billion | +1.6% |
| 1966 | 2.70 billion | +1.4% |
| 1967 | 2.74 billion | +1.2% |
| 1968 | 2.76 billion | +1.0% |
| 1969 | 2.78 billion | +0.8% |
| 1970 | 2.78 billion | -0.2% |
| 1971 | 2.77 billion | -0.2% |
| 1972 | 2.77 billion | -0.1% |
| 1973 | 2.78 billion | +0.3% |
| 1974 | 2.78 billion | +0.1% |
| 1975 | 2.80 billion | +0.5% |
| 1976 | 2.80 billion | +0.3% |
| 1977 | 2.82 billion | +0.5% |
| 1978 | 2.83 billion | +0.3% |
| 1979 | 2.84 billion | +0.6% |
| 1980 | 2.85 billion | +0.3% |
| 1981 | 2.86 billion | +0.4% |
| 1982 | 2.87 billion | +0.3% |
| 1983 | 2.88 billion | +0.2% |
| 1984 | 2.94 billion | +2.3% |
| 1985 | 3.04 billion | +3.2% |
| 1986 | 3.17 billion | +4.4% |
| 1987 | 3.33 billion | +5.1% |
| 1988 | 3.47 billion | +4.3% |
| 1989 | 3.56 billion | +2.6% |
| 1990 | 3.63 billion | +2.0% |
| 1991 | 3.68 billion | +1.5% |
| 1992 | 3.73 billion | +1.2% |
| 1993 | 3.77 billion | +1.1% |
| 1994 | 3.81 billion | +1.1% |
| 1995 | 3.85 billion | +1.0% |
| 1996 | 3.88 billion | +0.9% |
| 1997 | 3.92 billion | +1.0% |
| 1998 | 3.96 billion | +0.9% |
| 1999 | 4.01 billion | +1.3% |
| 2000 | 4.07 billion | +1.4% |
| 2001 | 4.12 billion | +1.4% |
| 2002 | 4.18 billion | +1.3% |
| 2003 | 4.24 billion | +1.4% |
| 2004 | 4.30 billion | +1.4% |
| 2005 | 4.34 billion | +0.9% |
| 2006 | 4.37 billion | +0.7% |
| 2007 | 4.40 billion | +0.7% |
| 2008 | 4.42 billion | +0.6% |
| 2009 | 4.46 billion | +0.8% |
| 2010 | 4.49 billion | +0.8% |
| 2011 | 4.53 billion | +0.9% |
| 2012 | 4.57 billion | +0.9% |
| 2013 | 4.61 billion | +0.8% |
| 2014 | 4.65 billion | +1.0% |
| 2015 | 4.69 billion | +0.9% |
| 2016 | 4.74 billion | +1.0% |
| 2017 | 4.79 billion | +1.0% |
| 2018 | 4.85 billion | +1.1% |
| 2019 | 4.90 billion | +1.2% |
| 2020 | 4.95 billion | +1.0% |
| 2021 | 4.99 billion | +0.7% |
| 2022 | 5.03 billion | +0.8% |
| 2023 | 5.07 billion | +0.8% |
| 2024 | 5.11 billion | +0.9% |
Cambodia compared with similar countries
- Cambodia's 5.11 billion is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 1.89 billion, 2.7× the median. (47 countries reporting)
- Cambodia's 5.11 billion is above the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 1.03 billion, 5.0× the median. (30 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Cumulative co2 land use in Cambodia changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1851 | +92.8% | 1.15 million | 2.22 million |
| 1852 | +45.3% | 2.22 million | 3.22 million |
| 1853 | +31.6% | 3.22 million | 4.24 million |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 5.67 million | 1.15 million | 10.09 million | 10 |
| 1860s | 16.06 million | 11.10 million | 21.26 million | 10 |
| 1870s | 37.44 million | 23.42 million | 52.77 million | 10 |
| 1880s | 83.31 million | 57.45 million | 110.49 million | 10 |
| 1890s | 148.55 million | 116.96 million | 180.63 million | 10 |
| 1900s | 223.15 million | 187.57 million | 259.35 million | 10 |
| 1910s | 309.40 million | 267.84 million | 351.59 million | 10 |
| 1920s | 483.23 million | 368.71 million | 609.68 million | 10 |
| 1930s | 804.99 million | 642.59 million | 974.45 million | 10 |
| 1940s | 1.21 billion | 1.01 billion | 1.43 billion | 10 |
| 1950s | 1.90 billion | 1.50 billion | 2.34 billion | 10 |
| 1960s | 2.62 billion | 2.41 billion | 2.78 billion | 10 |
| 1970s | 2.80 billion | 2.77 billion | 2.84 billion | 10 |
| 1980s | 3.10 billion | 2.85 billion | 3.56 billion | 10 |
| 1990s | 3.83 billion | 3.63 billion | 4.01 billion | 10 |
| 2000s | 4.29 billion | 4.07 billion | 4.46 billion | 10 |
| 2010s | 4.68 billion | 4.49 billion | 4.90 billion | 10 |
| 2020s | 5.03 billion | 4.95 billion | 5.11 billion | 5 |
Countries ranked near Cambodia
More climate change data for Cambodia
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 62.43 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 12,288 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 3,008 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 9,280 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 11.35 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 331.43 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 20,858 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 1,671 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 19,187 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 6.31 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cumulative co2 land use in Cambodia?
- Cumulative co2 land use in Cambodia was 5.11 billion in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest cumulative co2 land use recorded in Cambodia?
- The highest recorded value was 5.11 billion in 2024.
- What is the lowest cumulative co2 land use recorded in Cambodia?
- The lowest recorded value was 1.15 million in 1850.
- How does Cambodia rank for cumulative co2 land use?
- Cambodia ranks 34th out of 197 countries with data for 2024.
- Is cumulative co2 land use rising or falling in Cambodia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 9.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Cambodia data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Cumulative co2 land use. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 175 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).