Sri Lanka vs Uganda: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change

Sri Lanka
2.82 billion tonnes
in 2024
Uganda
2.96 billion tonnes
in 2024
Sri Lanka rank
55th
Uganda rank
53rd

Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change over time

  • Sri Lanka
  • Uganda
01.0B2.0B3.0B185019372024

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 2.96 billion tonnes against 2.82 billion tonnes in Sri Lanka, a difference of 132.65 million tonnes.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 175 shared years of data; in 1850 it was Sri Lanka ahead.

Sri Lanka ranks 55th and Uganda ranks 53rd of 197 countries.

Across the 18 decades both report, Sri Lanka averaged higher in 13 and Uganda in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sri Lanka Uganda Difference Ahead
1850s 106.53 million tonnes 70.59 million tonnes 35.94 million tonnes Sri Lanka
1860s 258.13 million tonnes 151.46 million tonnes 106.67 million tonnes Sri Lanka
1870s 327.70 million tonnes 220.38 million tonnes 107.32 million tonnes Sri Lanka
1880s 367.70 million tonnes 291.68 million tonnes 76.01 million tonnes Sri Lanka
1890s 462.19 million tonnes 346.42 million tonnes 115.77 million tonnes Sri Lanka
1900s 592.83 million tonnes 365.10 million tonnes 227.73 million tonnes Sri Lanka
1910s 695.99 million tonnes 358.22 million tonnes 337.77 million tonnes Sri Lanka
1920s 777.83 million tonnes 393.95 million tonnes 383.87 million tonnes Sri Lanka
1930s 853.79 million tonnes 513.62 million tonnes 340.18 million tonnes Sri Lanka
1940s 1.02 billion tonnes 667.61 million tonnes 352.87 million tonnes Sri Lanka
1950s 1.27 billion tonnes 918.38 million tonnes 351.00 million tonnes Sri Lanka
1960s 1.65 billion tonnes 1.37 billion tonnes 282.45 million tonnes Sri Lanka
1970s 1.97 billion tonnes 1.83 billion tonnes 146.51 million tonnes Sri Lanka
1980s 2.13 billion tonnes 2.22 billion tonnes 95.16 million tonnes Uganda
1990s 2.25 billion tonnes 2.49 billion tonnes 240.90 million tonnes Uganda
2000s 2.44 billion tonnes 2.72 billion tonnes 280.90 million tonnes Uganda
2010s 2.71 billion tonnes 2.89 billion tonnes 188.28 million tonnes Uganda
2020s 2.80 billion tonnes 2.95 billion tonnes 143.15 million tonnes Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, Sri Lanka or Uganda?
Uganda, at 2.96 billion tonnes against 2.82 billion tonnes in Sri Lanka as of 2024.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change between Sri Lanka and Uganda?
132.65 million tonnes, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Uganda?
175 years are reported by both, from 1850 to 2024.
How do Sri Lanka and Uganda rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change?
Sri Lanka ranks 55th and Uganda ranks 53rd of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Global Carbon Budget (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sri Lanka vs Uganda: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change. Statizoid, drawing on Global Carbon Budget (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 07 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-land-use/sri-lanka/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-land-use/sri-lanka/uganda/">Sri Lanka vs Uganda: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change
Unit
tonnes
Source
Global Carbon Budget (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
197 places, 34,475 data points, 1850–2024
Last refreshed

Cumulative emissions of carbon dioxide (CO₂) from land-use change since the first year of available data, measured in tonnes.