Cumulative co2 land use in Sri Lanka
Sri Lanka: Cumulative co2 land use was 2.82 billion in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
2.82 billion
Change on year
up 0.4%
World rank
55th
of 197 countries
All-time high
2.82 billion
in 2024
All-time low
21.55 million
in 1850
Years of data
175
1850–2024
Cumulative co2 land use in Sri Lanka, 1850–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
In 2024, cumulative co2 land use in Sri Lanka stood at 2.82 billion. That is the highest value across all 175 years on record.
The figure is up 0.4% on the previous year and up 4.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cumulative co2 land use in Sri Lanka peaked at 2.82 billion in 2024 and was at its lowest, 21.55 million, in 1850.
That places Sri Lanka 55th out of 197 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Cumulative co2 land use in Sri Lanka, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1850 | 21.55 million | — |
| 1851 | 41.58 million | +93.0% |
| 1852 | 60.68 million | +45.9% |
| 1853 | 79.13 million | +30.4% |
| 1854 | 97.72 million | +23.5% |
| 1855 | 116.21 million | +18.9% |
| 1856 | 134.73 million | +15.9% |
| 1857 | 152.95 million | +13.5% |
| 1858 | 170.94 million | +11.8% |
| 1859 | 189.82 million | +11.0% |
| 1860 | 206.12 million | +8.6% |
| 1861 | 219.48 million | +6.5% |
| 1862 | 231.49 million | +5.5% |
| 1863 | 243.24 million | +5.1% |
| 1864 | 254.40 million | +4.6% |
| 1865 | 264.88 million | +4.1% |
| 1866 | 274.85 million | +3.8% |
| 1867 | 285.52 million | +3.9% |
| 1868 | 295.80 million | +3.6% |
| 1869 | 305.50 million | +3.3% |
| 1870 | 311.74 million | +2.0% |
| 1871 | 316.52 million | +1.5% |
| 1872 | 320.52 million | +1.3% |
| 1873 | 324.01 million | +1.1% |
| 1874 | 327.38 million | +1.0% |
| 1875 | 330.32 million | +0.9% |
| 1876 | 333.01 million | +0.8% |
| 1877 | 335.51 million | +0.8% |
| 1878 | 337.87 million | +0.7% |
| 1879 | 340.11 million | +0.7% |
| 1880 | 343.93 million | +1.1% |
| 1881 | 348.33 million | +1.3% |
| 1882 | 353.51 million | +1.5% |
| 1883 | 358.77 million | +1.5% |
| 1884 | 364.29 million | +1.5% |
| 1885 | 369.86 million | +1.5% |
| 1886 | 375.74 million | +1.6% |
| 1887 | 381.45 million | +1.5% |
| 1888 | 387.15 million | +1.5% |
| 1889 | 393.94 million | +1.8% |
| 1890 | 402.61 million | +2.2% |
| 1891 | 414.59 million | +3.0% |
| 1892 | 428.17 million | +3.3% |
| 1893 | 440.33 million | +2.8% |
| 1894 | 453.65 million | +3.0% |
| 1895 | 466.61 million | +2.9% |
| 1896 | 480.38 million | +3.0% |
| 1897 | 496.42 million | +3.3% |
| 1898 | 511.73 million | +3.1% |
| 1899 | 527.44 million | +3.1% |
| 1900 | 541.69 million | +2.7% |
| 1901 | 553.58 million | +2.2% |
| 1902 | 564.00 million | +1.9% |
| 1903 | 575.93 million | +2.1% |
| 1904 | 586.88 million | +1.9% |
| 1905 | 598.21 million | +1.9% |
| 1906 | 610.17 million | +2.0% |
| 1907 | 621.54 million | +1.9% |
| 1908 | 632.06 million | +1.7% |
| 1909 | 644.23 million | +1.9% |
| 1910 | 654.16 million | +1.5% |
| 1911 | 664.10 million | +1.5% |
| 1912 | 672.97 million | +1.3% |
| 1913 | 681.81 million | +1.3% |
| 1914 | 692.12 million | +1.5% |
| 1915 | 700.95 million | +1.3% |
| 1916 | 710.39 million | +1.3% |
| 1917 | 719.00 million | +1.2% |
| 1918 | 727.52 million | +1.2% |
| 1919 | 736.89 million | +1.3% |
| 1920 | 745.34 million | +1.1% |
| 1921 | 753.00 million | +1.0% |
| 1922 | 760.50 million | +1.0% |
| 1923 | 768.03 million | +1.0% |
| 1924 | 774.92 million | +0.9% |
| 1925 | 781.63 million | +0.9% |
| 1926 | 788.28 million | +0.9% |
| 1927 | 794.95 million | +0.8% |
| 1928 | 802.20 million | +0.9% |
| 1929 | 809.41 million | +0.9% |
| 1930 | 816.90 million | +0.9% |
| 1931 | 824.56 million | +0.9% |
| 1932 | 832.58 million | +1.0% |
| 1933 | 840.60 million | +1.0% |
| 1934 | 848.72 million | +1.0% |
| 1935 | 856.96 million | +1.0% |
| 1936 | 865.98 million | +1.1% |
| 1937 | 874.67 million | +1.0% |
| 1938 | 883.99 million | +1.1% |
| 1939 | 892.98 million | +1.0% |
| 1940 | 909.00 million | +1.8% |
| 1941 | 928.88 million | +2.2% |
| 1942 | 951.20 million | +2.4% |
| 1943 | 976.30 million | +2.6% |
| 1944 | 1.00 billion | +2.8% |
| 1945 | 1.03 billion | +2.7% |
| 1946 | 1.06 billion | +2.7% |
| 1947 | 1.09 billion | +2.7% |
| 1948 | 1.11 billion | +2.5% |
| 1949 | 1.15 billion | +2.8% |
| 1950 | 1.17 billion | +2.1% |
| 1951 | 1.19 billion | +1.9% |
| 1952 | 1.21 billion | +1.8% |
| 1953 | 1.23 billion | +1.8% |
| 1954 | 1.25 billion | +1.7% |
| 1955 | 1.28 billion | +1.8% |
| 1956 | 1.30 billion | +1.9% |
| 1957 | 1.33 billion | +2.0% |
| 1958 | 1.35 billion | +2.0% |
| 1959 | 1.38 billion | +1.6% |
| 1960 | 1.39 billion | +1.1% |
| 1961 | 1.40 billion | +0.9% |
| 1962 | 1.52 billion | +8.3% |
| 1963 | 1.60 billion | +5.1% |
| 1964 | 1.66 billion | +3.9% |
| 1965 | 1.71 billion | +3.0% |
| 1966 | 1.75 billion | +2.5% |
| 1967 | 1.80 billion | +2.5% |
| 1968 | 1.83 billion | +1.7% |
| 1969 | 1.86 billion | +1.4% |
| 1970 | 1.88 billion | +1.2% |
| 1971 | 1.90 billion | +1.1% |
| 1972 | 1.92 billion | +1.0% |
| 1973 | 1.94 billion | +1.0% |
| 1974 | 1.95 billion | +0.9% |
| 1975 | 1.98 billion | +1.3% |
| 1976 | 2.01 billion | +1.4% |
| 1977 | 2.04 billion | +1.5% |
| 1978 | 2.05 billion | +0.8% |
| 1979 | 2.07 billion | +0.6% |
| 1980 | 2.08 billion | +0.6% |
| 1981 | 2.09 billion | +0.4% |
| 1982 | 2.10 billion | +0.6% |
| 1983 | 2.11 billion | +0.5% |
| 1984 | 2.12 billion | +0.5% |
| 1985 | 2.13 billion | +0.6% |
| 1986 | 2.14 billion | +0.6% |
| 1987 | 2.16 billion | +0.5% |
| 1988 | 2.17 billion | +0.5% |
| 1989 | 2.18 billion | +0.5% |
| 1990 | 2.19 billion | +0.5% |
| 1991 | 2.20 billion | +0.6% |
| 1992 | 2.21 billion | +0.6% |
| 1993 | 2.23 billion | +0.6% |
| 1994 | 2.24 billion | +0.8% |
| 1995 | 2.26 billion | +0.7% |
| 1996 | 2.28 billion | +0.8% |
| 1997 | 2.29 billion | +0.6% |
| 1998 | 2.31 billion | +0.7% |
| 1999 | 2.32 billion | +0.5% |
| 2000 | 2.33 billion | +0.5% |
| 2001 | 2.34 billion | +0.5% |
| 2002 | 2.36 billion | +0.6% |
| 2003 | 2.37 billion | +0.6% |
| 2004 | 2.42 billion | +2.2% |
| 2005 | 2.44 billion | +0.9% |
| 2006 | 2.47 billion | +0.9% |
| 2007 | 2.52 billion | +2.2% |
| 2008 | 2.56 billion | +1.4% |
| 2009 | 2.58 billion | +1.1% |
| 2010 | 2.62 billion | +1.6% |
| 2011 | 2.65 billion | +1.0% |
| 2012 | 2.67 billion | +0.7% |
| 2013 | 2.69 billion | +0.6% |
| 2014 | 2.70 billion | +0.5% |
| 2015 | 2.71 billion | +0.6% |
| 2016 | 2.73 billion | +0.5% |
| 2017 | 2.75 billion | +0.8% |
| 2018 | 2.76 billion | +0.5% |
| 2019 | 2.78 billion | +0.4% |
| 2020 | 2.78 billion | +0.3% |
| 2021 | 2.79 billion | +0.3% |
| 2022 | 2.80 billion | +0.4% |
| 2023 | 2.81 billion | +0.4% |
| 2024 | 2.82 billion | +0.4% |
Sri Lanka compared with similar countries
- Sri Lanka's 2.82 billion is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 629.27 million, 4.5× the median. (58 countries reporting)
- Sri Lanka's 2.82 billion is above the median for South Asia, which is 2.53 billion, 1.1× the median. (6 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Cumulative co2 land use in Sri Lanka changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1851 | +93.0% | 21.55 million | 41.58 million |
| 1852 | +45.9% | 41.58 million | 60.68 million |
| 1853 | +30.4% | 60.68 million | 79.13 million |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 106.53 million | 21.55 million | 189.82 million | 10 |
| 1860s | 258.13 million | 206.12 million | 305.50 million | 10 |
| 1870s | 327.70 million | 311.74 million | 340.11 million | 10 |
| 1880s | 367.70 million | 343.93 million | 393.94 million | 10 |
| 1890s | 462.19 million | 402.61 million | 527.44 million | 10 |
| 1900s | 592.83 million | 541.69 million | 644.23 million | 10 |
| 1910s | 695.99 million | 654.16 million | 736.89 million | 10 |
| 1920s | 777.83 million | 745.34 million | 809.41 million | 10 |
| 1930s | 853.79 million | 816.90 million | 892.98 million | 10 |
| 1940s | 1.02 billion | 909.00 million | 1.15 billion | 10 |
| 1950s | 1.27 billion | 1.17 billion | 1.38 billion | 10 |
| 1960s | 1.65 billion | 1.39 billion | 1.86 billion | 10 |
| 1970s | 1.97 billion | 1.88 billion | 2.07 billion | 10 |
| 1980s | 2.13 billion | 2.08 billion | 2.18 billion | 10 |
| 1990s | 2.25 billion | 2.19 billion | 2.32 billion | 10 |
| 2000s | 2.44 billion | 2.33 billion | 2.58 billion | 10 |
| 2010s | 2.71 billion | 2.62 billion | 2.78 billion | 10 |
| 2020s | 2.80 billion | 2.78 billion | 2.82 billion | 5 |
Countries ranked near Sri Lanka
More climate change data for Sri Lanka
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 327.09 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 3,418 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 618.46 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 2,800 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 2.33 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 100 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 4,168 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 2,071 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 2,097 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 7.82 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cumulative co2 land use in Sri Lanka?
- Cumulative co2 land use in Sri Lanka was 2.82 billion in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest cumulative co2 land use recorded in Sri Lanka?
- The highest recorded value was 2.82 billion in 2024.
- What is the lowest cumulative co2 land use recorded in Sri Lanka?
- The lowest recorded value was 21.55 million in 1850.
- How does Sri Lanka rank for cumulative co2 land use?
- Sri Lanka ranks 55th out of 197 countries with data for 2024.
- Is cumulative co2 land use rising or falling in Sri Lanka?
- Over the last ten years it is up 4.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Sri Lanka data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Cumulative co2 land use. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 175 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).