Australia vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Energy — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)

Australia
416,200 kt
in 2023
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
857,027 kt
in 2023
Australia rank
20th
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
20th

Energy — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) over time

  • Australia
  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k196119922023

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 857,027 kt against 416,200 kt in Australia, a difference of 440,827 kt.

That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 2.1 times Australia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 20th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 20th of 231 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 3 and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Difference Ahead
1960s 141,451 kt 40,108 kt 101,343 kt Australia
1970s 201,915 kt 62,603 kt 139,312 kt Australia
1980s 273,892 kt 69,519 kt 204,373 kt Australia
1990s 324,293 kt 453,645 kt 129,352 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2000s 397,082 kt 584,353 kt 187,271 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2010s 429,237 kt 768,534 kt 339,297 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s 418,444 kt 819,153 kt 400,710 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher energy — emissions (co2eq), Australia or Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 857,027 kt against 416,200 kt in Australia as of 2023.
What is the difference in energy — emissions (co2eq) between Australia and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
440,827 kt, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank globally for energy — emissions (co2eq)?
Australia ranks 20th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 20th of 231 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Energy — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Energy — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/energy-emissions-co2eq-ar5-fao-tier-1/australia/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/energy-emissions-co2eq-ar5-fao-tier-1/australia/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/">Australia vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Energy — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Energy — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
264 places, 15,205 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf