Congo vs Eswatini: Energy Use (Pre- and Post-Production) — Emissions (N2O) (N2O)

Congo
0.0138 kt
in 2023
Eswatini
0.0146 kt
in 2023
Congo rank
153rd
Eswatini rank
151st

Energy Use (Pre- and Post-Production) — Emissions (N2O) (N2O) over time

  • Congo
  • Eswatini
00.010.020.03199020062023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 0.0146 kt against 0.0138 kt in Congo, a difference of 0.0008 kt.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Eswatini ahead.

Congo ranks 153rd and Eswatini ranks 151st of 242 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Eswatini in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Eswatini Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0026 kt 0.0065 kt 0.0039 kt Eswatini
2000s 0.0055 kt 0.0071 kt 0.0016 kt Eswatini
2010s 0.0212 kt 0.014 kt 0.0071 kt Congo
2020s 0.0135 kt 0.0159 kt 0.0023 kt Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher energy use (pre- and post-production) — emissions, Congo or Eswatini?
Eswatini, at 0.0146 kt against 0.0138 kt in Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in energy use (pre- and post-production) — emissions between Congo and Eswatini?
0.0008 kt, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Eswatini?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Congo and Eswatini rank globally for energy use (pre- and post-production) — emissions?
Congo ranks 153rd and Eswatini ranks 151st of 242 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Energy Use (Pre- and Post-Production) — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Eswatini: Energy Use (Pre- and Post-Production) — Emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/energy-use-pre-and-post-production-emissions-n2o/congo-rep/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/energy-use-pre-and-post-production-emissions-n2o/congo-rep/eswatini/">Congo vs Eswatini: Energy Use (Pre- and Post-Production) — Emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Energy Use (Pre- and Post-Production) — Emissions (N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
276 places, 8,972 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain Emissions from Pre- and Post-Agricultural Production provides estimates of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and related activity data associated with pre- and post-production stages of agrifood systems. The domain includes methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), carbon dioxide (CO2), fluorinated gases (F-gases) and their aggregates expressed in carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2eq). Estimates are computed following Tier 1 methods of the IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014) and are disseminated annually.