Ethiopia vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Enteric Fermentation — Emissions

Ethiopia
2,052 kt
in 2050
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
12,941 kt
in 2050
Ethiopia rank
15th
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
14th

Enteric Fermentation — Emissions over time

  • Ethiopia
  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
05.0k10.0k15.0k196120052050

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 12,941 kt against 2,052 kt in Ethiopia, a difference of 10,889 kt.

That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 6.3 times Ethiopia's.

Across all 33 years both countries report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has been ahead every year.

Ethiopia ranks 15th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 14th of 210 countries.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ethiopia Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Difference Ahead
1990s 1,228 kt 6,802 kt 5,573 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2000s 1,646 kt 8,309 kt 6,663 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2010s 2,423 kt 12,339 kt 9,916 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s 2,932 kt 14,810 kt 11,878 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2030s 1,906 kt 10,973 kt 9,067 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2050s 2,052 kt 12,941 kt 10,890 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enteric fermentation — emissions, Ethiopia or Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 12,941 kt against 2,052 kt in Ethiopia as of 2050.
What is the difference in enteric fermentation — emissions between Ethiopia and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
10,889 kt, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
33 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2050.
How do Ethiopia and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank globally for enteric fermentation — emissions?
Ethiopia ranks 15th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 14th of 210 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Enteric Fermentation — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ethiopia vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Enteric Fermentation — Emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 August 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/enteric-fermentation-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/ethiopia/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/enteric-fermentation-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/ethiopia/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/">Ethiopia vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Enteric Fermentation — Emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enteric Fermentation — Emissions (CH4)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
246 places, 14,610 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf