Ethiopia vs Sudan: Enteric Fermentation — Emissions
Enteric Fermentation — Emissions over time
- Ethiopia
- Sudan
How they compare
Ethiopia currently reports 2,052 kt against 1,739 kt in Sudan, a difference of 313 kt.
That makes Ethiopia's figure about 1.2 times Sudan's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Ethiopia has been ahead every year.
Ethiopia ranks 15th and Sudan ranks 16th of 191 countries.
Ethiopia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2,482 kt | 1,738 kt | 744.93 kt | Ethiopia |
| 2020s | 2,932 kt | 1,749 kt | 1,183 kt | Ethiopia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enteric fermentation — emissions, Ethiopia or Sudan?
- Ethiopia, at 2,052 kt against 1,739 kt in Sudan as of 2050.
- What is the difference in enteric fermentation — emissions between Ethiopia and Sudan?
- 313 kt, with Ethiopia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Ethiopia and Sudan rank globally for enteric fermentation — emissions?
- Ethiopia ranks 15th and Sudan ranks 16th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Enteric Fermentation — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf