Central America vs United Republic of Tanzania: Enteric Fermentation — Emissions (CO2eq)

Central America
110,678 kt
in 2050
United Republic of Tanzania
34,116 kt
in 2050
Central America rank
21st
United Republic of Tanzania rank
6th

Enteric Fermentation — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

  • Central America
  • United Republic of Tanzania
025.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k196120052050

How they compare

Central America currently reports 110,678 kt against 34,116 kt in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 76,562 kt.

That makes Central America's figure about 3.2 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

Across all 65 years both countries report, Central America has been ahead every year.

Central America ranks 21st and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 6th of 32 groups.

Central America has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central America United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 50,762 kt 9,695 kt 41,067 kt Central America
1970s 63,187 kt 11,790 kt 51,397 kt Central America
1980s 75,912 kt 13,798 kt 62,114 kt Central America
1990s 77,422 kt 15,498 kt 61,924 kt Central America
2000s 79,512 kt 20,077 kt 59,435 kt Central America
2010s 87,560 kt 28,964 kt 58,596 kt Central America
2020s 94,494 kt 39,692 kt 54,802 kt Central America
2030s 97,852 kt 27,389 kt 70,463 kt Central America
2050s 110,678 kt 34,116 kt 76,562 kt Central America

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enteric fermentation — emissions (co2eq), Central America or United Republic of Tanzania?
Central America, at 110,678 kt against 34,116 kt in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2050.
What is the difference in enteric fermentation — emissions (co2eq) between Central America and United Republic of Tanzania?
76,562 kt, with Central America ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central America and United Republic of Tanzania?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Central America and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for enteric fermentation — emissions (co2eq)?
Central America ranks 21st and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 6th of 32 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Enteric Fermentation — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central America vs United Republic of Tanzania: Enteric Fermentation — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/enteric-fermentation-emissions-co2eq-ar5-fao-tier-1/central-america/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/enteric-fermentation-emissions-co2eq-ar5-fao-tier-1/central-america/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Central America vs United Republic of Tanzania: Enteric Fermentation — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enteric Fermentation — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
246 places, 14,610 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf