Australia and New Zealand vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Food Packaging — Emissions (CO2eq)

Australia and New Zealand
4,304 kt
in 2023
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
4,242 kt
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand rank
9th
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
21st

Food Packaging — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
05.0k10.0k15.0k199020062023

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 4,304 kt against 4,242 kt in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), a difference of 62 kt.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 9th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 21st of 121 countries.

Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Difference Ahead
1990s 8,291 kt 997.78 kt 7,293 kt Australia and New Zealand
2000s 10,175 kt 1,386 kt 8,790 kt Australia and New Zealand
2010s 6,255 kt 3,203 kt 3,052 kt Australia and New Zealand
2020s 4,317 kt 4,295 kt 21.45 kt Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food packaging — emissions (co2eq), Australia and New Zealand or Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
Australia and New Zealand, at 4,304 kt against 4,242 kt in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) as of 2023.
What is the difference in food packaging — emissions (co2eq) between Australia and New Zealand and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
62 kt, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank globally for food packaging — emissions (co2eq)?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 9th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 21st of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Packaging — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Food Packaging — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-packaging-emissions-co2eq-ar5-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-packaging-emissions-co2eq-ar5-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/">Australia and New Zealand vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Food Packaging — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food Packaging — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
168 places, 5,582 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf