Nauru vs Suriname: Food Packaging — Emissions (CO2eq)
Food Packaging — Emissions (CO2eq) over time
- Nauru
- Suriname
How they compare
Nauru currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Suriname, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Nauru ahead.
Nauru ranks 137th and Suriname ranks 137th of 146 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Nauru averaged higher in 2 and Suriname in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nauru | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 8.01 kt | 0 kt | 8.01 kt | Nauru |
| 2000s | 1.17 kt | 0 kt | 1.17 kt | Nauru |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 13.4 kt | 13.4 kt | Suriname |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher food packaging — emissions (co2eq), Nauru or Suriname?
- Nauru, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Suriname as of 2023.
- What is the difference in food packaging — emissions (co2eq) between Nauru and Suriname?
- 0 kt, with Nauru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and Suriname?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Nauru and Suriname rank globally for food packaging — emissions (co2eq)?
- Nauru ranks 137th and Suriname ranks 137th of 146 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Packaging — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf