Senegal vs Serbia and Montenegro: Food Packaging — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O
Food Packaging — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O over time
- Senegal
- Serbia and Montenegro
How they compare
Senegal currently reports 0.326 kt against 0.252 kt in Serbia and Montenegro, a difference of 0.074 kt.
That makes Senegal's figure about 1.3 times Serbia and Montenegro's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Serbia and Montenegro has been ahead every year.
Senegal ranks 55th and Serbia and Montenegro ranks 57th of 120 countries.
Serbia and Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher food packaging — emissions (co2eq) from n2o, Senegal or Serbia and Montenegro?
- Senegal, at 0.326 kt against 0.252 kt in Serbia and Montenegro as of 2023.
- What is the difference in food packaging — emissions (co2eq) from n2o between Senegal and Serbia and Montenegro?
- 0.074 kt, with Senegal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Senegal and Serbia and Montenegro?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2004.
- How do Senegal and Serbia and Montenegro rank globally for food packaging — emissions (co2eq) from n2o?
- Senegal ranks 55th and Serbia and Montenegro ranks 57th of 120 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Packaging — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf