Botswana vs Cuba: Food Processing — Emissions
Food Processing — Emissions over time
- Botswana
- Cuba
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 123.48 kt against 99.75 kt in Cuba, a difference of 23.73 kt.
That makes Botswana's figure about 1.2 times Cuba's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Cuba ahead.
Botswana ranks 77th and Cuba ranks 80th of 103 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 1 and Cuba in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Cuba | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 38.28 kt | 186.13 kt | 147.86 kt | Cuba |
| 2010s | 76.39 kt | 199.33 kt | 122.93 kt | Cuba |
| 2020s | 121.83 kt | 119.53 kt | 2.3 kt | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher food processing — emissions, Botswana or Cuba?
- Botswana, at 123.48 kt against 99.75 kt in Cuba as of 2023.
- What is the difference in food processing — emissions between Botswana and Cuba?
- 23.73 kt, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Cuba?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Botswana and Cuba rank globally for food processing — emissions?
- Botswana ranks 77th and Cuba ranks 80th of 103 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Processing — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf