Mexico vs Zimbabwe: Food Processing — Emissions
Food Processing — Emissions over time
- Mexico
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 2,959 kt against 2,914 kt in Mexico, a difference of 45 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Mexico ahead.
Mexico ranks 26th and Zimbabwe ranks 25th of 103 countries.
Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3,295 kt | 204.26 kt | 3,091 kt | Mexico |
| 2010s | 2,476 kt | 505.02 kt | 1,971 kt | Mexico |
| 2020s | 2,809 kt | 1,751 kt | 1,058 kt | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher food processing — emissions, Mexico or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 2,959 kt against 2,914 kt in Mexico as of 2023.
- What is the difference in food processing — emissions between Mexico and Zimbabwe?
- 45 kt, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Zimbabwe?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2023.
- How do Mexico and Zimbabwe rank globally for food processing — emissions?
- Mexico ranks 26th and Zimbabwe ranks 25th of 103 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Processing — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf