Brazil vs China: Food Processing — Emissions
Food Processing — Emissions over time
- Brazil
- China
How they compare
China currently reports 0.7641 kt against 0.4724 kt in Brazil, a difference of 0.2917 kt.
That makes China's figure about 1.6 times Brazil's.
Across all 16 years both countries report, China has been ahead every year.
Brazil ranks 4th and China ranks 2nd of 98 countries.
China has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0001 kt | 1.42 kt | 1.42 kt | China |
| 2010s | 0.0117 kt | 1.22 kt | 1.2 kt | China |
| 2020s | 0.3961 kt | 0.7839 kt | 0.3877 kt | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher food processing — emissions, Brazil or China?
- China, at 0.7641 kt against 0.4724 kt in Brazil as of 2023.
- What is the difference in food processing — emissions between Brazil and China?
- 0.2917 kt, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and China?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2023.
- How do Brazil and China rank globally for food processing — emissions?
- Brazil ranks 4th and China ranks 2nd of 98 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Processing — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf