Cameroon vs Congo: Food Processing — Emissions (N2O) — FAO TIER 1
Food Processing — Emissions (N2O) — FAO TIER 1 over time
- Cameroon
- Congo
How they compare
Cameroon currently reports 0.0004 kt against 0.0004 kt in Congo, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.
Cameroon ranks 89th and Congo ranks 89th of 103 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cameroon | Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0003 kt | 0.0005 kt | 0.0002 kt | Congo |
| 2020s | 0.0004 kt | 0.0004 kt | 0 kt | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher food processing — emissions (n2o) — fao tier 1, Cameroon or Congo?
- Cameroon, at 0.0004 kt against 0.0004 kt in Congo as of 2023.
- What is the difference in food processing — emissions (n2o) — fao tier 1 between Cameroon and Congo?
- 0 kt, with Cameroon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Congo?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Cameroon and Congo rank globally for food processing — emissions (n2o) — fao tier 1?
- Cameroon ranks 89th and Congo ranks 89th of 103 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Processing — Emissions (N2O) — FAO TIER 1. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf