Malawi vs Romania: Food Processing — Emissions
Food Processing — Emissions over time
- Malawi
- Romania
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 0.0189 kt against 0.0185 kt in Romania, a difference of 0.0004 kt.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Romania ahead.
Malawi ranks 32nd and Romania ranks 33rd of 98 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 1 and Romania in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0099 kt | 0.0211 kt | 0.0112 kt | Romania |
| 2010s | 0.0135 kt | 0.0192 kt | 0.0057 kt | Romania |
| 2020s | 0.0194 kt | 0.018 kt | 0.0014 kt | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher food processing — emissions, Malawi or Romania?
- Malawi, at 0.0189 kt against 0.0185 kt in Romania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in food processing — emissions between Malawi and Romania?
- 0.0004 kt, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Romania?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2023.
- How do Malawi and Romania rank globally for food processing — emissions?
- Malawi ranks 32nd and Romania ranks 33rd of 98 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Processing — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf