Cuba vs Moldova: Food Retail — Emissions
Food Retail — Emissions over time
- Cuba
- Moldova
How they compare
Moldova currently reports 0.0047 kt against 0.0046 kt in Cuba, a difference of 0.0001 kt.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 142nd and Moldova ranks 140th of 222 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0026 kt | 0.0002 kt | 0.0024 kt | Cuba |
| 2000s | 0.0036 kt | 0.0021 kt | 0.0016 kt | Cuba |
| 2010s | 0.0048 kt | 0.0047 kt | 0.0001 kt | Cuba |
| 2020s | 0.0049 kt | 0.0046 kt | 0.0003 kt | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher food retail — emissions, Cuba or Moldova?
- Moldova, at 0.0047 kt against 0.0046 kt in Cuba as of 2023.
- What is the difference in food retail — emissions between Cuba and Moldova?
- 0.0001 kt, with Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Moldova?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and Moldova rank globally for food retail — emissions?
- Cuba ranks 142nd and Moldova ranks 140th of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Retail — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf