Which has higher food retail — emissions, Mauritius or Zimbabwe?

Zimbabwe, at 0.0098 kt against 0.0097 kt in Mauritius as of 2023.

What is the difference in food retail — emissions between Mauritius and Zimbabwe?

0.0001 kt, with Zimbabwe ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Zimbabwe?

32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Retail — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Mauritius vs Zimbabwe: Food Retail — Emissions (CH4)

Mauritius

0.0097 kt

in 2023

Zimbabwe

0.0098 kt

in 2023

Mauritius rank

112th

Zimbabwe rank

109th

Food Retail — Emissions (CH4) over time

Mauritius
Zimbabwe

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.0098 kt against 0.0097 kt in Mauritius, a difference of 0.0001 kt.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Mauritius ranks 112th and Zimbabwe ranks 109th of 209 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Mauritius	Zimbabwe	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0002 kt	0.0019 kt	0.0017 kt	Zimbabwe
2000s	0.0025 kt	0.012 kt	0.0095 kt	Zimbabwe
2010s	0.0101 kt	0.0073 kt	0.0028 kt	Mauritius
2020s	0.0089 kt	0.0101 kt	0.0011 kt	Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food retail — emissions, Mauritius or Zimbabwe?: Zimbabwe, at 0.0098 kt against 0.0097 kt in Mauritius as of 2023.
What is the difference in food retail — emissions between Mauritius and Zimbabwe?: 0.0001 kt, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Zimbabwe?: 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Mauritius and Zimbabwe rank globally for food retail — emissions?: Mauritius ranks 112th and Zimbabwe ranks 109th of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Retail — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Zimbabwe: Food Retail — Emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-retail-emissions-ch4/mauritius/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-retail-emissions-ch4/mauritius/zimbabwe/">Mauritius vs Zimbabwe: Food Retail — Emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Food Retail — Emissions (CH4)
Unit: kt
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage: 243 places, 7,524 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed: 23 October 2026

The FAOSTAT domain Emissions from Pre- and Post-Agricultural Production provides estimates of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and related activity data associated with pre- and post-production stages of agrifood systems. The domain includes methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), carbon dioxide (CO2), fluorinated gases (F-gases) and their aggregates expressed in carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2eq). Estimates are computed following Tier 1 methods of the IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014) and are disseminated annually.