Aruba vs Guinea: Food Retail — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O
Food Retail — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O over time
- Aruba
- Guinea
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 0.1293 kt against 0.1277 kt in Guinea, a difference of 0.0016 kt.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Aruba has been ahead every year.
Aruba ranks 139th and Guinea ranks 140th of 190 countries.
Aruba has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.135 kt | 0.0368 kt | 0.0982 kt | Aruba |
| 2010s | 0.142 kt | 0.0465 kt | 0.0955 kt | Aruba |
| 2020s | 0.1228 kt | 0.1173 kt | 0.0056 kt | Aruba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher food retail — emissions (co2eq) from n2o, Aruba or Guinea?
- Aruba, at 0.1293 kt against 0.1277 kt in Guinea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in food retail — emissions (co2eq) from n2o between Aruba and Guinea?
- 0.0016 kt, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Guinea?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Aruba and Guinea rank globally for food retail — emissions (co2eq) from n2o?
- Aruba ranks 139th and Guinea ranks 140th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Retail — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf