Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Kazakhstan: Food Retail — Emissions

Democratic Republic of the Congo
0.0001 kt
in 2023
Kazakhstan
0.0427 kt
in 2023
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
19th
Kazakhstan rank
20th

Food Retail — Emissions over time

  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
  • Kazakhstan
00.0250.050.0750.1199220072023

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports 0.0427 kt against 0.0001 kt in Democratic Republic of the Congo, a difference of 0.0426 kt.

That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 458.8 times Democratic Republic of the Congo's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Kazakhstan has been ahead every year.

Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 19th and Kazakhstan ranks 20th of 20 countries.

Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of the Congo Kazakhstan Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0001 kt 0.0049 kt 0.0048 kt Kazakhstan
2010s 0.0001 kt 0.0303 kt 0.0301 kt Kazakhstan
2020s 0.0001 kt 0.0563 kt 0.0562 kt Kazakhstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food retail — emissions, Democratic Republic of the Congo or Kazakhstan?
Kazakhstan, at 0.0427 kt against 0.0001 kt in Democratic Republic of the Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in food retail — emissions between Democratic Republic of the Congo and Kazakhstan?
0.0426 kt, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of the Congo and Kazakhstan?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Democratic Republic of the Congo and Kazakhstan rank globally for food retail — emissions?
Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 19th and Kazakhstan ranks 20th of 20 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Retail — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Kazakhstan: Food Retail — Emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-retail-emissions-n2o/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/kazakhstan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-retail-emissions-n2o/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/kazakhstan/">Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Kazakhstan: Food Retail — Emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food Retail — Emissions (N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
243 places, 7,524 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Pre- and post- agricultural production includes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and related activity data, generated from pre- and post-agriculture production stages of the agri-food systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). The domain includes methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), carbon dioxide (CO2) and CO2 equivalent (CO2eq) emissions from the above activities as well as the aggregate fluorinated gases (F-gases) emissions. Estimates are available by country, with global coverage and are updated annually.The FAOSTAT domain disseminates information estimates of CH4, N2O, CO2 emissions, F-gases, their aggregates in CO2eq in units of kilotonnes (kt, or 10^6 kg), and the underlying activity data. CO2eq emissions are computed by using the IPCC Fifth Assessment report global warming potentials, AR5 (IPCC, 2014). Data are available for most countries and territories, for standard FAOSTAT regional aggregations, and for Annex I and non-Annex I country groups.