Ecuador vs Indonesia: Share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food
Ecuador
53.8%
in 2015
Indonesia
56.0%
in 2015
Ecuador rank
88th
Indonesia rank
86th
Share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food over time
- Ecuador
- Indonesia
How they compare
Indonesia currently reports 56.0% against 53.8% in Ecuador, a difference of 2.2%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Indonesia ahead.
Ecuador ranks 88th and Indonesia ranks 86th of 217 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 2 and Indonesia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Indonesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 65.5% | 120.6% | 55.1% | Indonesia |
| 2000s | 64.0% | 64.0% | 0.0% | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 56.1% | 51.7% | 4.4% | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food, Ecuador or Indonesia?
- Indonesia, at 56.0% against 53.8% in Ecuador as of 2015.
- What is the difference in share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food between Ecuador and Indonesia?
- 2.2%, with Indonesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Indonesia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
- How do Ecuador and Indonesia rank globally for share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food?
- Ecuador ranks 88th and Indonesia ranks 86th of 217 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Crippa et al. (2021) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Food system emissions include agriculture, land-use change, and supply chain emissions (transport, packaging, food processing, retail, cooking, and waste). Emissions are quantified based on food production, not consumption. This means they do not account for international trade.