Dominica vs Tajikistan: LULUCF — Emissions (CO2) — UNFCCC
LULUCF — Emissions (CO2) — UNFCCC over time
- Dominica
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Tajikistan currently reports -2,092 kt against -2,762 kt in Dominica, a difference of 670 kt.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Dominica has been ahead every year.
Dominica ranks 47th and Tajikistan ranks 44th of 89 countries.
Dominica has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominica | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -371.85 kt | -1,887 kt | 1,515 kt | Dominica |
| 2000s | -132.77 kt | -1,951 kt | 1,818 kt | Dominica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions (co2) — unfccc, Dominica or Tajikistan?
- Tajikistan, at -2,092 kt against -2,762 kt in Dominica as of 2010.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions (co2) — unfccc between Dominica and Tajikistan?
- 670 kt, with Tajikistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominica and Tajikistan?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2005.
- How do Dominica and Tajikistan rank globally for lulucf — emissions (co2) — unfccc?
- Dominica ranks 47th and Tajikistan ranks 44th of 89 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CO2) — UNFCCC. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf