Azerbaijan vs Poland: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Azerbaijan
- Poland
How they compare
Azerbaijan currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Poland, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Azerbaijan ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 132nd and Poland ranks 132nd of 254 countries.
Azerbaijan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0056 kt | 0.0018 kt | 0.0039 kt | Azerbaijan |
| 2000s | 0.0046 kt | 0.004 kt | 0.0005 kt | Azerbaijan |
| 2010s | 0.0026 kt | 0.001 kt | 0.0016 kt | Azerbaijan |
| 2020s | 0.0066 kt | 0.0021 kt | 0.0045 kt | Azerbaijan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Azerbaijan or Poland?
- Azerbaijan, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Poland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Azerbaijan and Poland?
- 0 kt, with Azerbaijan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Poland?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Azerbaijan and Poland rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Azerbaijan ranks 132nd and Poland ranks 132nd of 254 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf