LULUCF — Emissions (N2O) — FAO TIER 1 in Poland
Poland: LULUCF — Emissions (N2O) — FAO TIER 1 was 0 kt in 2023. ◆ Volatile
LULUCF — Emissions (N2O) — FAO TIER 1 in Poland, 1990–2023
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in kt.
Analysis
Poland recorded 0 kt for lulucf — emissions (n2o) — fao tier 1 in 2023. That is the lowest value across all 34 years on record.
That represents a change of down 100.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, lulucf — emissions (n2o) — fao tier 1 in Poland peaked at 0.0276 kt in 2003 and was at its lowest, 0 kt, in 2007.
Poland ranks 119th of 236 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0018 kt | 0.0009 kt | 0.0024 kt | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.004 kt | 0 kt | 0.0276 kt | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.001 kt | 0 kt | 0.0039 kt | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0021 kt | 0 kt | 0.0084 kt | 4 |
Countries ranked near Poland
- 119 Afghanistan 0 kt compare
- 119 Andorra 0 kt compare
- 119 Anguilla 0 kt compare
- 119 Antigua and Barbuda 0 kt compare
- 119 Aruba 0 kt compare
- 119 Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha 0 kt compare
- 119 Austria 0 kt compare
- 119 Azerbaijan 0 kt compare
- 119 Bahrain 0 kt compare
- 119 Barbados 0 kt compare
- 119 Belgium 0 kt compare
- 119 Bermuda 0 kt compare
- 119 Botswana 0 kt compare
- 119 British Virgin Islands 0 kt compare
- 119 Burkina Faso 0 kt compare
- 119 Cabo Verde 0 kt compare
- 119 Cayman Islands 0 kt compare
- 119 Channel Islands 0 kt compare
- 119 China, Hong Kong SAR 0 kt compare
- 119 China, Macao SAR 0 kt compare
- 119 China, Taiwan Province of 0 kt compare
- 119 Comoros 0 kt compare
- 119 Cook Islands 0 kt compare
- 119 Cyprus 0 kt compare
- 119 Czechia 0 kt compare
- 119 Denmark 0 kt compare
- 119 Djibouti 0 kt compare
- 119 Dominica 0 kt compare
- 119 Egypt 0 kt compare
- 119 Eritrea 0 kt compare
- 119 Estonia 0 kt compare
- 119 Falkland Islands (Malvinas) 0 kt compare
- 119 Faroe Islands 0 kt compare
- 119 Finland 0 kt compare
- 119 French Polynesia 0 kt compare
- 119 Gambia 0 kt compare
- 119 Germany 0 kt compare
- 119 Gibraltar 0 kt compare
- 119 Greenland 0 kt compare
- 119 Grenada 0 kt compare
- 119 Guadeloupe 0 kt compare
- 119 Guam 0 kt compare
- 119 Iceland 0 kt compare
- 119 Iraq 0 kt compare
- 119 Ireland 0 kt compare
- 119 Isle of Man 0 kt compare
- 119 Israel 0 kt compare
- 119 Jamaica 0 kt compare
- 119 Jordan 0 kt compare
- 119 Kiribati 0 kt compare
- 119 Kuwait 0 kt compare
- 119 Kyrgyzstan 0 kt compare
- 119 Lebanon 0 kt compare
- 119 Lesotho 0 kt compare
- 119 Libya 0 kt compare
- 119 Liechtenstein 0 kt compare
- 119 Lithuania 0 kt compare
- 119 Luxembourg 0 kt compare
- 119 Maldives 0 kt compare
- 119 Mali 0 kt compare
- 119 Malta 0 kt compare
- 119 Marshall Islands 0 kt compare
- 119 Martinique 0 kt compare
- 119 Mauritania 0 kt compare
- 119 Mauritius 0 kt compare
- 119 Mayotte 0 kt compare
- 119 Micronesia (Federated States of) 0 kt compare
- 119 Montenegro 0 kt compare
- 119 Montserrat 0 kt compare
- 119 Nauru 0 kt compare
- 119 Netherlands (Kingdom of the) 0 kt compare
- 119 Netherlands Antilles (former) 0 kt compare
- 119 Niger 0 kt compare
- 119 Niue 0 kt compare
- 119 Norfolk Island 0 kt compare
- 119 Northern Mariana Islands 0 kt compare
- 119 Norway 0 kt compare
- 119 Oman 0 kt compare
- 119 Pakistan 0 kt compare
- 119 Palau 0 kt compare
- 119 Palestine 0 kt compare
- 119 Pitcairn 0 kt compare
- 119 Puerto Rico 0 kt compare
- 119 Qatar 0 kt compare
- 119 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0 kt compare
- 119 Saint Lucia 0 kt compare
- 119 Saint Pierre and Miquelon 0 kt compare
- 119 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0 kt compare
- 119 Samoa 0 kt compare
- 119 Sao Tome and Principe 0 kt compare
- 119 Saudi Arabia 0 kt compare
- 119 Serbia 0 kt compare
- 119 Seychelles 0 kt compare
- 119 Singapore 0 kt compare
- 119 Slovakia 0 kt compare
- 119 Slovenia 0 kt compare
- 119 Solomon Islands 0 kt compare
- 119 Somalia 0 kt compare
- 119 Svalbard and Jan Mayen Islands 0 kt compare
- 119 Sweden 0 kt compare
- 119 Switzerland 0 kt compare
- 119 Tajikistan 0 kt compare
- 119 Tokelau 0 kt compare
- 119 Tonga 0 kt compare
- 119 Trinidad and Tobago 0 kt compare
- 119 Turkmenistan 0 kt compare
- 119 Turks and Caicos Islands 0 kt compare
- 119 Tuvalu 0 kt compare
- 119 United Arab Emirates 0 kt compare
- 119 United States Virgin Islands 0 kt compare
- 119 Uzbekistan 0 kt compare
- 119 Vanuatu 0 kt compare
- 119 Wallis and Futuna Islands 0 kt compare
- 119 Western Sahara 0 kt compare
- 119 Yemen 0 kt compare
- 119 Micronesia 0 kt compare
- 119 Polynesia 0 kt compare
More climate change data for Poland
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) — FAO TIER 1 19,935 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) — FAO 4,534 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) — FAO 15,401 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (N2O) — FAO TIER 1 17.11 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CH4) — FAO TIER 1 550.03 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) — FAO TIER 1 7,175 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) — FAO TIER 1 7,089 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) — FAO TIER 1 86.67 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (N2O) — FAO TIER 1 26.75 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CH4) — FAO TIER 1 3.1 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is lulucf — emissions (n2o) — fao tier 1 in Poland?
- Lulucf — emissions (n2o) — fao tier 1 in Poland was 0 kt in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest lulucf — emissions (n2o) — fao tier 1 recorded in Poland?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0276 kt in 2003.
- What is the lowest lulucf — emissions (n2o) — fao tier 1 recorded in Poland?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 kt in 2007.
- How does Poland rank for lulucf — emissions (n2o) — fao tier 1?
- Poland ranks 119th out of 236 countries with data for 2023.
- Is lulucf — emissions (n2o) — fao tier 1 rising or falling in Poland?
- Over the last ten years it is down 100.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Poland data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of LULUCF — Emissions (N2O) — FAO TIER 1. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 34 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf